Jeremy Scahill and Peter Beinart on WikiLeaks: Policy Porn, or Public Service?

Jeremy Scahill and Peter Beinart on WikiLeaks: Policy Porn, or Public Service?

Jeremy Scahill and Peter Beinart on WikiLeaks: Policy Porn, or Public Service?

WIth the latest diplomatic cables dump from WikiLeaks sending waves throughout the political and media worlds, the organization’s activities are raising questions such as, is releasing all this information gratuitous, even irresponsible? Or is it a valuable public service?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

WIth the latest diplomatic cables dump from WikiLeaks sending waves throughout the political and media worlds, the organization’s activities are raising questions such as, is releasing all this information gratuitous, even irresponsible? Is it just a bunch of policy porn? Or is it a valuable public service?

The Nation‘s Jeremy Scahill went on the Joy Behar Show Monday to debate the issue with Peter Beinart, senior political writer at The Daily Beast. Scahill argues that the main thing to remember is that these leaks shed light on important issues: diplomats spying on other diplomats, US attacks on Yemen and more.

But do we really need to know about Putin and Berlusconi’s bromance? And do the rest of the cables include information that might do more harm than good? Would we have gone to war in Iraq in the first place if WikiLeaks had been around? Watch the clip to hear Scahill and Beinart weigh in.

Jeremy Scahill is a Puffin Foundation Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute and author of the book Blackwater. You can read his articles here.

Braden Goyette

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x