Jeremy Scahill: Why Has the US Been Silent on Yemen’s Uprising?

Jeremy Scahill: Why Has the US Been Silent on Yemen’s Uprising?

Jeremy Scahill: Why Has the US Been Silent on Yemen’s Uprising?

Does the silence of the Obama administration on the uprisings in Yemen have something to do with the US-backed president’s role as a crucial partner in the war on terror?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The uprising in Yemen took a significant turn yesterday following a series of high-level defections against President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s regime. After Yemeni forces opened fire on demonstrators Friday, killing 45 people and wounding some 350 others, top military leaders decided they could no longer stand by Saleh and chose to ally themselves with the protesters. The Nation’s Jeremy Scahill joined Democracy Now! this morning to discuss the motivations behind the sharp contrast in the Obama administration’s response to the rising crisis in Yemen, as opposed to the more forceful condemnations the administration has meted out to the leaders of Libya and other Middle Eastern nations.

Yemen has from the outset played a crucial role in the US war on terror, Scahill says. President Saleh has accepted hundreds of millions of dollars in military and security aid in exchange for US access to Yemeni territories. As part of the covert war inside of Yemen, the US has conducted drone attacks that have killed civilians, all of which were covered up when the Yemeni government claimed the strikes as their own.

“The fact is that the US has been almost entirely silent in the face of Saleh’s forces gunning down their own citizens, which stands in stark contrast to the position that the US has taken on some of the other regimes in the area,” he says. “You can’t help but wonder if the US is hoping that Saleh holds on in Yemen.”

In the same program, Scahill discusses the no-fly zone in Libya, calling it a “recipe for disaster.”

—Sara Jerving

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x