John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

You would think everyone in Congress could agree to be against food poisoning. You would be wrong. The overwhelming majority of House Republicans voted against cracking down on food-borne illness.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The US Senate voted unanimously for the Food Safety Modernization Act, a sweeping measure that gives the federal government broad new powers to inspect processing plants, order recalls of contaminated products and apply US standards to imported foods.

No surprise there.

After recent contamination scares involving peanuts, eggs and produce, Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, should be able to be able to put aside differences and  agree that its important to assure that what we eat does not make us sick.

You would think that protecting kids from food-borne illness would be something everyone in Congress could agree upon. 

You would, unfortunately, be wrong.

When the measure got to the House, the overwhelming majority of Republicans voted against food safety.

Apparently, House Republicans are so committed to freedom that they are determined to defend the right of salmonella and listeria to roam at the dinner table.

As a result the food-safety bill was approved in the House by a mere 215-144 majority—more than enough to send this vital bill to the president’s desk—but hardly a ringing endorsement. 

The “yes” votes came from 205 Democrats and 10 Republicans.

 The “no” votes were those of 136 Republicans and 8 Democrats (most of them farm-state Blue Dogs).

Among the Republican “no” voters were incoming Speaker John Boehner, incoming Majority Leader Eric Cantor and incoming Agriculture Committee chairman Frank Lucas.

The Food Safety Modernization Act will become law. And it will do a lot of good by:

1. Allowing the FDA to order a recall of tainted foods. Currently the agency can only negotiate with businesses to order voluntary recalls. 

2. Requiring the FDA to create new produce safety regulations for producers of the highest risk fruits and vegetables.

3. Increasing inspections of domestic and foreign food facilities, directing the most resources to those operations with the highest risk profiles. The riskiest domestic facilities would be inspected every three years.

4. Requiring farms and processors to keep records to help the government trace recalled foods.

5. Requiring grocery stores to proactively alert consumers about recalls.

"This is a big victory for consumers that finally brings food-safety laws into the 21st century," says Jean Halloran, the director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union. "This win is a powerful testament to the people across the country who came to Washington to tell their lawmakers how contaminated food had killed their loved ones or left them horribly sick. This win is for them and all Americans. For a long time, we’ve been saying that we needed to do a better job of making sure our food is safe, and under this bill, we will."

Good news for consumers is bad news for salmonella, however.

No matter how you spin it, food-borne illness lost a round with the passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act.

But don’t think that stomach sickness will disappear altogether. Food poisoning will be well represented when Boehner and his fellow Republicans take charge of the House in January.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x