Jonathan Schell: Using Nuclear Energy Is ‘Playing With Fire’

Jonathan Schell: Using Nuclear Energy Is ‘Playing With Fire’

Jonathan Schell: Using Nuclear Energy Is ‘Playing With Fire’

Joining Charlie Rose, Schell explains that nuclear power has no place in a world so vulnerable to widespread disaster.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As workers struggle to cool the reactors at the Fukushima nuclear plant, Japan’s nuclear agency raised the severity level of the crisis to the same level as 1979’s Three Mile Island incident. Will the US respond to Japan’s disaster by re-examining our own nuclear energy use?

The Nation’s Jonathan Schell, author William Tucker and Michael Levi, director of the program on energy security and climate change at the Council on Foreign Relations, joined Charlie Rose last night to discuss the future of nuclear power in this country and around the world.

With a mix of opinions on the subject—Schell arguing for nuclear abolition, Tucker for expansion and Levi somewhere in the middle—the panel focuses on the crucial question of whether nuclear power even has a place in a world so vulnerable to widespread disaster. According to Schell, the US is “playing with fire” by expanding our nuclear energy use, not only risking an international incident but also opening the spigot for nuclear proliferation.

For more coverage of Japan’s disaster, read Schell’s "From Hiroshima to Fukushima" and go here to view Schell on last night’s Charlie Rose.

—Sara Jerving

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x