Kerry’s Mission to Moscow

Kerry’s Mission to Moscow

After meeting with Putin, the secretary of state calls for a new US-Russian partnership—but can he enact it?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new US-Russian cold war. American Secretary of State Kerry’s meeting with Russian President Putin, on December 15, frames the discussion.

Cohen interprets Kerry’s public remark that when Washington and Moscow work together, good things happen, as a call for a partnership in resolving the Ukrainian conflict and for a coalition against the Islamic State in Syria—in effect, a major departure from current Obama administration policy of cold war and “isolating Russia.” But will Kerry be backed by the White House, Cohen asks, recalling that a similar initiative by Kerry in May was torpedoed by Vice President Biden and his allies in the State Department and Senate.

Cohen and Bachelor then discuss the mounting crises in Ukraine and Syria, the main topics of the Kerry-Putin meeting, and how the United States and Russia might cooperate in coping with them. In this connection, Cohen points to the decision the European Union will make later this week about whether or not to end its economic sanctions against Russia, noting that several European governments, led by Italy, want the sanctions ended, but that under US pressure they will probably be extended, however incongruously.

Cohen also notes a series of recent anti-Russian provocations, including the Turkish shooting-down of a Russian warplane and a more recent incident at sea, that seem to be a coordinated political war against Russia. He asks, are the people behind these provocations—in Washington, Brussels and elsewhere—aware that they are risking actual war with Russia, or do they actually seek it?

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x