Khalilzad for President? (No, Not Here!)

Khalilzad for President? (No, Not Here!)

Khalilzad for President? (No, Not Here!)

Wake me up if this is a nightmare, but suddenly the idea that Zalmay Khalilzad might try to become president of Afghanistan is being taken seriously indeed.

That a fierce American neocon might actually try to install himself as the elected leader of a country occupied by American troops might be laughable–but no. What’s next? Will Bill Kristol challenge Nouri al-Maliki to be Iraq’s next prime minister? How about Joe Lieberman replacing beleaguered Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert?

That Zal-Khal might run for president in Afghanistan has been rumored around for a while, and the people I’ve talked to don’t know what to make of it. But in today’s Washington Post, in Al Kamen’s “In the Loop” column, it’s treated, well, seriously.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Wake me up if this is a nightmare, but suddenly the idea that Zalmay Khalilzad might try to become president of Afghanistan is being taken seriously indeed.

That a fierce American neocon might actually try to install himself as the elected leader of a country occupied by American troops might be laughable–but no. What’s next? Will Bill Kristol challenge Nouri al-Maliki to be Iraq’s next prime minister? How about Joe Lieberman replacing beleaguered Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert?

That Zal-Khal might run for president in Afghanistan has been rumored around for a while, and the people I’ve talked to don’t know what to make of it. But in today’s Washington Post, in Al Kamen’s “In the Loop” column, it’s treated, well, seriously.

Kamen quotes Richard Holbrooke, the Democratic foreign policy guru, saying a bit jocularly that Zal-Khal’s recent talk at the Asia Society provoked backroom gossip that he might actually run. (Khalilzad, by the way, is Sunni Pashtun Afghan by birth.) Kamen goes on to say:

He told Afghanistan’s Ariana Television Network in April that “I have said earlier that I’m not a candidate for any position in Afghanistan, but I am at the service of the Afghan people.” That huge trial balloon has never stopped orbiting the earth.

And an article Sunday in the Independent, a British newspaper, said that “representatives of Mr. Khalilzad . . . have discreetly sounded out various factions to ascertain his chances.” The article, written from Kabul, said that “many Afghan commentators say he would enjoy a high degree of support.”

You can read the whole Independent article, titled “Bush’s former Iraq ambassador to seek Afghan presidency,” here. Quote:

Three meetings have been held with opposition groups in recent months to promote Mr Khalilzad, pictured, as a “unifying” candidate in a country where deep divisions have begun to emerge between the Pashtun communities of the south and the Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras of the north.

If you’ve lost track of Zal-Khal’s career, he was George W. Bush’s inept envoy to the Iraqi opposition groups before the war in 2003, during which time be worked closely with Ahmed Chalabi, Kurdish separatists, and Shiite religious extremists to create the mess that became Iraq’s governing council. His work done, he bumbled off to Afghanistan where he made a mess of that country as the first U.S. ambassador to the post-Taliban regime. Having succeeded in that task, he was promoted to the post of U.S. ambassador to Iraq, where he forced through the divisive and flawed Iraqi constitution that, to this day, guarantees political chaos in that country. Finally, he ended up replacing John Bolton as America’s ambassador to the United Nations. A stellar record, indeed.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x