Letters

Letters

The DSK dossier; more jobs = higher GDP.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The DSK Dossier

Madison, N.C.

Re “Au Revoir, France” [June 13]: Is The Nation at least a little bit sorry about having printed that over-the-top ideological venting by Katha Pollitt about Dominique Strauss-Kahn?

Pollitt never had the least doubt that Strauss-Kahn was guilty as sin of everything the poor “victim” accused him of.

DAVID DALTON


Yonkers, N.Y.

When I was 21, after spending a year in Paris working and living, I was raped. This man, who was French, was someone I considered to be a new platonic friend.

When my friends (from Guadeloupe) persuaded me to go to the police, I called my Parisian aunt to inform her that I would use her name as a contact, as I would need to give a report of the crime at the local commissariat. Her response was, “Well, what do you expect? Of course you will be raped if you go to the home of a man you hardly know.” The police were equally enlightened. And when I went to a hospital for an exam, the trend continued.

From all I learned in those dreadful few days, the rape was apparently my fault. I was treated like a fierce perpetrator who was violating a code of honor over which French society had, long before my arrival, formed a deep and sacred pact.

It was not until reading Katha Pollitt’s column that I finally found someone who echoed, with total clarity, what I have tried to articulate regarding the collective French consciousness. I said, “Au revoir, France” in 1980… and never had the slightest desire to return.

ANNE POLLACK


More Jobs = Higher GDP

Lansdowne, Pa.

Alice Amsden’s letter [June 13] states that “increases in GDP raise paid employment.” This is an exaggeration. GDP is a result, not a cause. Gross domestic product results from a number of statistical factors, including paid employment.

Except in rare instances where the latest GDP number or trend might influence an employer to hire someone, or an employer does so as the result of a similarly influenced investor or government action, GDP doesn’t trickle up, down or sideways to create paid jobs.

Like the proverbial Better Mousetrap Theory, Amsden’s statement is, like many, if not most, supply-side economics concepts, literally backward. More paid jobs increase GDP.

JOHN A. MOORE


Correction

In “The Shelters That Clinton Built” [Aug. 1/8], authors Isabel Macdonald and Isabeau Doucet quoted the International Organization for Migration’s Bradley Mellicker as stating, “That’s a lie,” after the quotation from the Clinton Foundation’s COO, Laura Graham, claiming that IOM had played a role in the procurement process for the trailers. While IOM played no role, Mellicker’s statement was made in response to a claim by a different Clinton Foundation source that IOM had led the procurement process, and not in response to Graham. We regret the error.

IOM’s communications director, Leonard Doyle, who declined to be interviewed for the article, has since clarified the matter: “While IOM was not involved in the development of the particular Leogane project, nor in the identification of the contractor, an IOM staff member seconded to the Office of the Special Envoy helped compile a list of potential contractors at one stage in the process.”

The Nation understands that the Clinton Foundation and Office of the Special Envoy looked at the list of unsolicited offers and picked a winner, and that there was no public bid.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x