Letters From the April 23, 2018, Issue

Letters From the April 23, 2018, Issue

Letters From the April 23, 2018, Issue

Enlighten us!… The renewable solution… Let them feel our fear…

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Enlighten Us!

Steven Pinker’s book Enlightenment Now is making a case for optimism, not offering a balanced analysis of what’s wrong with Western culture. David A. Bell’s review [“The PowerPoint Philosophe,” April 2] misses the mark.
Carl Erickson
minneapolis

Thank you, David A. Bell, for this delightful (and wryly humorous) discussion of Pinker’s work. This is the kind of review I thoroughly enjoy, for while I may not agree with your critique of Pinker at all times (I personally loathe Nietzsche and Foucault and Derrida), your insightful observations and clear-sighted criticisms—complete with snarky but hilarious (and appropriate) comparisons between Pinker’s work, TED Talks, and Dan Brown’s Origin)—gives me a clear picture of whether or not I should take a hiatus from my own PhD reading in order to see if this book will have any value for my political-philosophy students. Your review gives me the confidence to decide that I should not bother to reduce either the foil of Ayn Rand or the insight of Thomas Picketty in order to make room for Pinker. Thank you for doing the labor for me!
Robert Borneman

A good and thorough critique of technocratic neoliberalism is sorely needed, and this might be as good a start as any for our particular time. Besides our dismal prospects in the face of anthropogenic climate change, we’re facing a slew of technologies—from artificial intelligence to genetic engineering and nanotech—that hold great promise for improving the lives of billions of people, but that require an understanding of the intimate coevolutionary dynamic between (radical) social movements and scientific discovery to achieve any kind of change that might be considered “progressive.” Thank you for a great read.
Neil Goldberg

The Renewable Solution

What could The Nation have been thinking, publishing the letter by Jim Padden with its nuclear-power-cheering nonsense [“Never Mind Armageddon,” April 2]? It is one thing to present minority or opposition viewpoints. It is another entirely to publish misinformation.

Nuclear power is and always has been a corporate-welfare dinosaur. After being subsidized by the government for 60 years, it makes less economic sense than ever. Its radioactive waste, which no one wants and which has never been dealt with, lasts longer than human civilization has existed. Future Fukushimas and Chernobyls threaten. Yet Padden says that nuclear power’s problems are “solvable.”

It’s time to get acquainted with the truth: Renewables, without subsidies, are now the cheapest source of new energy. Utility-scale solar generation increased 51 percent from 2016 to 2017. Wind increased 11 percent. Nuclear declined 1.5 percent.

Daniel Fleisher
baltimore

Let Them Feel Our Fear

The only way we’ll ever have gun control is if firearms are allowed into the halls and offices and onto the floors of both houses of Congress [“How to Beat the BS,” March 19/26]. Only when those who have sworn to represent “We the People” are subject to the same threats as we the people will our safety weigh as heavily as the NRA’s contributions, which function as successful bribes.
Liane Ellison Norman
pittsburgh

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x