Maine Backs Corporate and Presidential Accountability

Maine Backs Corporate and Presidential Accountability

Maine Backs Corporate and Presidential Accountability

Former Common Cause president Chellie Pingree, a passionate reformer who calls for a rapid end to the war in Iraq and supports the opening of impeachment hearings against President Bush, easily won Tuesday’s Democratic primary in Maine’s 1st congressional district.

The Democratic-leaning seat came open when incumbent Tom Allen decided to challenge Republican Senator Susan Collins this fall.

Pingree faced a free-spending challenge from a former Republican, Adam Cote, who switched parties to mount a campaign that was backed by business groups that were engaged in bluewashing — the tactic of pouring money into a Democratic primary in a blue state or district with hopes of nominating the candidate most inclined to favor corporate interests.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Former Common Cause president Chellie Pingree, a passionate reformer who calls for a rapid end to the war in Iraq and supports the opening of impeachment hearings against President Bush, easily won Tuesday’s Democratic primary in Maine’s 1st congressional district.

The Democratic-leaning seat came open when incumbent Tom Allen decided to challenge Republican Senator Susan Collins this fall.

Pingree faced a free-spending challenge from a former Republican, Adam Cote, who switched parties to mount a campaign that was backed by business groups that were engaged in bluewashing — the tactic of pouring money into a Democratic primary in a blue state or district with hopes of nominating the candidate most inclined to favor corporate interests.

Cote hoped to capitalize on the fact that the progressive vote in the Portland-area district would be divided between Pingree and several other anti-war Democrats, including state Rep. Ethan Strimling and prosecutor Mark Lawrence.

And he aggressively attacked Pingree, a former Maine state senator who was considered the front-runner, for backing presidential accountability. “Cote Will Focus On Economy, Pingree On Impeachment,” read a press release from Cote’s campaign, in which the candidate said of Pingree’s support for impeachment and Cote opposition to it: “This is a defining, substantive issue difference in this election.”

The attack was absurd. Pingree was never cautious about stating her support for holding President Bush and Vice President Cheney to account. But impeachment was not the central issue of her campaign. Despite what Cote and his corporate backers claimed, it was Pingree who made the economy a prime focus of her campaign. She has long been a leading advocate of health care reform, in Maine and nationally. And she’s an enthusiastic backer of new, progressive approaches on trade policy, energy policy and other concerns of working families.

Still, Cote’s campaign made impeachment an issue.

And if Cote wants to describe impeachment as the “defining” issue, well, fair enough.

Pingree is going to be the Democratic nominee. She was way ahead Tuesday night with 44 percent of the vote to 26 percent for Cote. And two other candidates who strongly backed impeachment, Strimling and Lawrence, were grabbing another 16 percent of the vote.

So presidential accountability proved to be a winning issue Tuesday. And corporate bluewashing suffered a serious setback.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x