Questionable clues?
Joshua Kosman and Henri PicciottoWe usually eschew end-of-clue punctuation, even when we manage to have a clue that is a bona fide sentence, as in this example: EMIGRANTS They have moved away from streaming illegally (9)
One exception is the exclamation point; as is standard in American cryptic usage, we generally use that to indicate an &lit clue. But the more common exception is the question mark. At the end of a clue, it can indicate quite a few different things. Sometimes it signals a jokey or punny definition (either the main one or the second part of a double-definition clue): ANDROCLES Mythical bird, originally living in a mountain range with amateur
veterinarian? (9)
DEMOCRATIC PARTY A pretty rad comic playing the blues? (10,5) GREAT DEPRESSION Economic catastrophe in the Grand Canyon? (5,10) HARD TIMES 1854 novel in the print edition of a newspaper? (4,5)
Sometimes it indicates a heteronymic reading of the entry: ANTIQUITY In olden times, a health club that won’t let you give up? (9) HATRACK Something you might see in the front hall or hear on a sitcom? (7)
It might flag a reading that is far-fetched or unexpected: ASSESSES Rates female donkeys? (8) COOPERATION Teamwork in making barrels? (11) DEMEANING Shameful process of making people nicer? (9)
…or even absurd or ridiculous: ACTIVIST Militant whose favorite part of a Shakespeare play is the penultimate section? (8) BUCOLIC Rural ailment afflicting infants at a New England school? (7) CORONATION Installation of a sovereign in Chad or Oman? (10) FOREARMED Prepared, like, half an octopus in the sound? (9) HAMBURGER One who encourages second choice for pork as a fast-food standard? (9)
A question mark could reveal that we suspect someone out there will object to a clue they will deem, well, questionable: FREE THROW Worth undertaking after a foul? (4,5) DETERGENT Barman’s cleanser? (9) GOLDENEYE Objective: refuse to be heard in a thriller about a duck? (9)
In short, all you can conclude from a question mark is that “something is going on here.” Or not! Sometimes a question mark is just a question mark: CROSSWORD Sorcerer, half looking back at weapon: “You’re wasting your time with
this?” (9)
This week’s cluing challenge: INTERROGATE. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen. And now, four links: • The current puzzle • Our puzzle-solving guidelines | PDF • Our e-books (solve past puzzles on your iOS device—many hints provided by the software!) • A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where every one of our clues is explained in detail. This is also where you can post quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle, as well as ask for hints.
Joshua Kosman and Henri PicciottoJoshua Kosman and Henri Picciotto are The Nation’s puzzlers. To read more about Kosman, click here. To read more about Picciotto, click here. Kosman and Picciotto explain what they’re up to in “Solving The Nation’s Cryptic Crosswords” (also available as a PDF). Check out The Nation’s Current Issue page each week for the latest puzzle.