March 30, 1981: Ronald Reagan Is Shot

March 30, 1981: Ronald Reagan Is Shot

An available gun transforms violent emotions into deadly action.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

It took more than a dozen years for the lesson of The Nation’s editorial on Reagan's near-assassination—that stricter gun control would have possibly prevented the attack—to bear fruition, in the Brady Law, mandating background checks for certain gun purchases, dedicated to the Reagan assistant who was shot and seriously injured that day. James Brady died in 2012 of complications from the wound, and his death was deemed a homicide.

The most irrelevant comment we hard on the day of the shooting came from a spokesman for an anti-gun control group, who was quoted as saying that since Washington already had strict laws, the incident was proof that gun control doesn’t work. Gun control laws in Washington or New York City or Detroit can never work so long as handguns can be purchased at a pawn shop in one state and transported to another. Handgun controls won’t solve the problem, but they would begin to reduce the risks. Ironically, the one Federal agency that deals with the interstate arms traffic—the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms—is slated for a severe cutback in the 1982 budget. Opponents of gun control, like John Connally, who told a television interviewer that more “discipline” was needed, in the sense of swifter, sterner punishment of all criminals, ignore the irrational component in assassinations and, indeed, in most of the murders in this country. An available gun transforms violent emotions into deadly action.

March 30, 1981

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x