Marching for Women’s Lives

Marching for Women’s Lives

Anyone who thinks the contemporary women’s movement is dying, over or simply irrelevant will have to think again after yesterday’s March for Women’s Lives.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Anyone who thinks the contemporary women’s movement is dying, over or simply irrelevant will have to think again after yesterday’s March for Women’s Lives. More than a million mothers, daughters, fathers and sons converged yesterday on the Washington Mall to affirm every woman’s right to reproductive healthcare and reproductive freedom, as well as the vitality of modern feminism.

The march, and the rallies that took place before and after, involved more than a year of planning by feminist, minority, civil libertarian and religious groups, including Planned Parenthood, the Feminist Majority, the Black Women’s Health Imperative, the ACLU and the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. The long-term strategizing and cooperative work clearly paid off–both by making this march one of the largest in US history, and by calling together a crowd that was impressively diverse. Many speakers at both rallies commented on this fact; morning emcee Lisa Gay Hamilton, who played lawyer Rebecca Washington on prime-time drama The Practice, noted that she had been to the historic 1992 women’s march, but from then to now “there [was] one major difference–and that’s the people of color” present on the Mall yesterday.

As a marcher, it was hard to fathom just how large the event was. Although police estimates have marked attendance in the high hundreds of thousands, organizers claim 1.15 million attendees (at the march, volunteers worked hard to count each person by registering marchers on paper, and then giving them a sticker declaring “Count me in!”, which signaled those who had been included in tally). In the morning, gigantic TV screens next to the main stage, and elsewhere on the Mall, displayed images of people stretching from the Washington Monument to the Capitol building. People started to filter onto the streets around 12 o’clock; the first marchers returned to the Mall around 2:30, after walking a two mile loop down Pennsylvania Avenue toward the White House and back around. At that point–two and a half hours after the first demonstrators hit the pavement–others were only just beginning their creep past the Monument. That’s how many people there were–enough to create a three-hour-long traffic jam.

There was a detectable amount of stumping for John Kerry during the rallies and the march–a bunch of mostly male volunteers (from what I could tell) were handing out “Women for Kerry” stickers–but signs, shirts and chants were mostly focused on demanding choice and reproductive healthcare and freedom for all women. Fashion-wise, pink ruled the day; Planned Parenthood, which deserves kudos for bringing out so many people from their affiliates across the country, marked their presence with hot pink T-shirts bearing the march logo on the back; Ms. magazine delegates donned black baby-Ts with a hot pink Ms. emblazoned across the chest; mass-produced signs from the Feminist Majority came in various shades of rose. The Pink Bloque, a radical dance troupe of young women from Chicago, decked themselves out in homemade pink miniskirts, sleeveless pink T-shirts and matching headbands.

There was the requisite anti-choice presence, concentrated for the most part on a fairly short stretch of Pennsylvania Avenue. But chants of “Not the church, not the state, women will decide their fate” easily drowned out the words even of those demonstrators with megaphones. Some of the anti-choice signs were simply too bizarre to ignore–like “Smile, the baby’s coming,” as if all 1 million marchers were presently pregnant–many were the same old gross-out, blown-up images of fetuses and blood. The notable exceptions were the more subtle, mass-produced posters of smiling women bearing the slogan “Women deserve better than abortion.” The anti-choice movement seems to be testing out a slick new marketing strategy, but it didn’t win any converts at the march.

As things wound down in the late afternoon, speakers continued to take the mike: The iconic Gloria Steinem, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, actress Ashley Judd and comedian Wanda Sykes all took turns keeping marchers rallied up and entertained. But no one managed to match the impact that surprise speaker Hillary Rodham Clinton had when she spoke in the morning to the gathering throngs. As she took the stage, it was as if the Beatles arrived; even progressives, who might lament that the US Senator is more of a centrist than they’d like, couldn’t help but scream and applaud. Urging the crowd to elect a pro-choice President come November, Clinton remarked, “if all we do is march today it will not change the condition the country is in.”

She’s right. But I can’t help but think the March for Women’s lives showed millions of people that the United States–or rather, the people who live in it–are in better shape than we thought. If the momentum generated in Washington carries through to November, perhaps we won’t need to have another March for Women’s Lives for quite a while–or better, ever again.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x