Marcy Wheeler: Is the Department of Defense Leak-Proof?

Marcy Wheeler: Is the Department of Defense Leak-Proof?

Marcy Wheeler: Is the Department of Defense Leak-Proof?

If the information that Bradley Manning allegedly leaked is so sensitive, why has DOD not taken basic security measures to protect their databases?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In 2008, someone was able to infect the Department of Defense’s computer network with malware by using a simple thumb drive. DOD tightened its policy toward its classified information, yet two years later, Pfc. Bradley Manning was allegedly able to walk in with a CD labeled “Lady Gaga” and download highly sensitive databases.

According to Firedoglake’s Marcy Wheeler, even now DOD is dragging its feet on protecting its classified network, SIPRnet. Speaking with The Nation at this year’s National Conference for Media Reform, Wheeler recounts how during a hearing held in mid-March of this year by Senators Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins, DOD laid out a timeline for responding to the sensitive information that made its way to WikiLeaks. But they’ve shown a poor track record of taking timely action in the past: even after Wired magazine published the revealing chat logs between Manning and hacker Adrian Lamo in June of last year, DOD did not get around to calling for two commissions to investigate what happened until late July, about two months after Manning’s arrest.

“It’s as if they didn’t believe the chat logs,” Wheeler says. But if the information that Manning allegedly leaked is so sensitive, Wheeler says, why has DOD not taken basic security measures to protect their databases?

For more, read Wheeler’s post, “One Year After Collateral Murder Release, DOD’s Networks Are Still Glaring Security Problem.”

—Kevin Gosztola

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x