Mark Hertsgaard: Ignoring Climate Change Is a Crime

Mark Hertsgaard: Ignoring Climate Change Is a Crime

Mark Hertsgaard: Ignoring Climate Change Is a Crime

As the US government continues to ignore the science on climate change, we are heading down the path towards an uninhabitable world.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Addressing climate change is now not only about how to reduce our carbon emissions, but how to learn to live with the environmental damage that’s already been done. So says The Nation’s Mark Hertsgaard, who joined Democracy Now! on Friday to discuss his new book, Hot: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth, which explains why this country’s inaction when it comes to climate change is a crime. The victims of the crime, he says, are the two billion kids who have been born around the world—since scientists alerted us about this problem—who face a life sentence dealing with the consequences.

The recent budget deal approved by Congress cuts $1.6 billion from the Environmental Protection Agency. This 16 percent decrease reduces funding for a climate desk at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and eliminates the position of assistant to the president for energy and climate change.

These cuts are a direct result of the fact that the United States is the only country where the legitimacy of the science behind climate change has been called into question, Hertsgaard says. Even other countries run by conservative governments have been more willing to confront climate change than the Obama administration.

The solution lies in investing in energy efficiency, not nuclear energy. “The reality is, going nuclear will make climate change worse, not better,” he says. “Look at the economics. It costs so much money to build a plant, it takes so long to build that plant, that by the time you’ve got it online, if you invested that same amount of money in energy efficiency, you would get seven times more greenhouse gas emission reductions.”

—Sara Jerving

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x