Moyers Fights Back

Moyers Fights Back

Republican aides and allies must not be allowed to control PBS.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Bush Administration allies who have taken over the Corporation for Public Broadcasting may have thought they could turn public television into another of their echo chambers without a fight. But they didn’t count on Bill Moyers.

Moyers, who secured thirty Emmys during three decades on PBS, stormed out of retirement May 15 to condemn manipulations of the network’s content and programming engineered by Kenneth Tomlinson, the Republican chair of the CPB board of directors, and to call for a renewed commitment to principled journalism at PBS and throughout American media. “I simply never imagined that any CPB chairman, Democrat or Republican, would cross the line from resisting White House pressure to carrying it out for the White House. But that’s what Kenneth Tomlinson has done,” Moyers told more than 2,000 activists, academics and journalists gathered in St. Louis for the National Conference for Media Reform. Moyers, who stepped down in December as the host of the highly regarded PBS program NOW With Bill Moyers, detailed Tomlinson’s partisan meddling, from the hiring of Bush aides and allies to fill key positions at the CPB to his allocation of $5 million in tax money to develop a weekly broadcast featuring the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal. But his main focus was the revelation that Tomlinson spent $10,000 last year to hire a contractor to monitor NOW and report on its supposed political bias. “Gee, Ken, for $2.50 a week, you could pick up a copy of TV Guide on the newsstand. A subscription is even cheaper, and I would have sent you a coupon that can save you up to 62 percent,” joked Moyers. “Hell, you could have called me–collect–and I would have told you what was on the broadcast that night.” (The full text of Moyers’s speech is at www.commondreams.org/views05/0516-34.htm.)

But Moyers was not just poking fun at Tomlinson–he was fighting back. He revealed that he’d written Tomlinson, suggesting that the pair debate the network’s future on a PBS program of Tomlinson’s choice, and called for the release of the results of the NOW monitoring. He also endorsed a call by Consumers Union, Media Access Project, Common Cause, the Consumer Federation of America and Free Press for a campaign “to take public broadcasting back–to take it back from threats, from interference, from those who would tell us we can only think what they command us to think.” The groups plan to hold hearings around the country. In addition, there’s a national petition campaign (www.freepress.net/action/pbs) to stop “top-down partisan meddling” with the network that seemed more timely than ever the day after Moyers spoke, when it was revealed that the GOP majority on the CPB board were scheming to redirect money from news coverage to music programming and preparing an “examination” of NPR’s Middle East coverage for evidence of bias.

Taking back PBS is merely the most urgent of the media reform initiatives highlighted at the conference, which also discussed moves to label so-called video “news” releases produced by the government and corporations; to close the digital divide by developing broadband wireless services as public utilities; and to reverse media consolidation. None of these fights will be won, however, without expanding the media reform movement beyond its current progressive base–making permanent the left-right coalition that emerged in 2003 to successfully beat back plans to rewrite ownership rules. Moyers held out hope for such a coalition, reading a letter from Congressman Ron Paul, a Texas conservative who praised NOW, and recalling that when President Nixon sought to cut funding for public affairs programming on PBS, it was saved because “there were still Republicans in America who did not march in ideological lockstep and who stood on principle against politicizing public television.” Tomlinson will not be stopped by Democrats alone; Republicans must step up too and say, “Hands off PBS.”

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x