No-Sweat Sit-Ins Hit Academe

No-Sweat Sit-Ins Hit Academe

Will a donation from Nike deflect Stanford’s efforts to curb sweatshop labor in the making of its sports regalia?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

On May 22 eleven Stanford University students staged a sit-in in the lobby of president John Hennessy’s office, demanding action on sweatshops. They were asking Hennessy to join the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC), a group founded by students and labor rights activists seven years ago to investigate abuses in the collegiate apparel industry, and to sign on to the Designated Suppliers Program (DSP), a system devised by the WRC to enforce universities’ existing codes of conduct. As wonky as it sounds, the DSP has recently caught fire among students. Earlier this spring sit-ins broke out at the universities of Southern California and Michigan demanding that those schools adopt the DSP. The week before the Stanford action, the University of Washington avoided a sit-in by doing just that.

Sophomore Bethany Woolman, reached by cellphone at the sit-in, said of president Hennessy’s dilemma over the DSP and the WRC, “We know he has the moral integrity to take this step, but we also know he needs the support of students to do it.” Might last year’s $105 million donation to the Stanford Business School by Nike CEO Phil Knight complicate Hennessy’s decision? After all, the University of Oregon backed out of the WRC after threats from multimillion-dollar donor Knight. Stanford’s administrators didn’t return calls in time for this report, but let’s hope they do show some integrity.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x