Noted.

Noted.

Dennis Kucinich’s impeachment play; architects of the subprime mortgage disaster; sexism and the Clinton campaign.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

KUCINICH v. BUSH:

Impeachment is usually proposed toward the close of a President’s tenure. The House tackled

Richard Nixon

deep in his second term; articles of impeachment were filed against

Harry Truman

for seizing steel mills nine months before his presidency finished; the Senate considered removing

Andrew Johnson

in the spring of his final year. This makes sense, as it takes time to recognize the seriousness of high crimes and misdemeanors, and even longer to loosen the tongues of former aides–such as ex-White House spokesman

Scott McClellan

, who will testify before the House Judiciary Committee June 20. So the thirty-five articles of impeachment Ohio Congressman

Dennis Kucinich

filed against President Bush June 9 are timely.

They are, as well, compelling; Kucinich’s extensive charges detail presidential lawlessness ranging from deliberate disregard of Congress’s authority to declare war, to authorizing warrantless wiretapping, to “obstruction of justice in the matter of

Valerie Plame Wilson

.” Democratic leaders would prefer to play politics in this election year, but Kucinich–and allies such as Florida Congressman

Robert Wexler

and the

American Freedom Campaign

–are right to note that the Constitution does not exempt a President from accountability simply because the campaign to replace him has commenced.   JOHN NICHOLS

SUBPRIME CRIBS:

In 2007 the national median price for a home was $239,000. To afford a down payment and monthly mortgage installments for such a purchase, the Center for Housing Policy estimates, the home buyer’s income should exceed $78,000. But for many working people–like childcare workers (median salary: $26,647), electricians ($45,406), even software programmers ($60,265)–that figure is becoming increasingly remote.

Not so for the architects of the subprime mortgage disaster, however.

Angelo Mozilo

, CEO of disgraced

Countrywide Financial

, a leading provider of subprime loans, took home a total compensation package of $48,133,155 in 2006, and as the market unraveled and foreclosure rates began to tick upward, Mozilo made hundreds of millions more by dumping company stock. Last year

Raymond McDaniel

of

Moody’s Corporation

, one of three principal credit rating agencies that continued to issue sterling reports on mortgage securities backed by defaulting loans, made $7,376,555.

Lloyd Blankfein

of

Goldman Sachs

, which made a $6 billion windfall betting against those securities, received $70,324,352, enough for him to toy with the idea of making a home purchase of his own–a 10.4-acre Hamptons estate listed at $41 million.

The deal fell through, but it would not have approached the most extravagant real estate grab of the year. That honor goes to hedge-fund manager

Louis Bacon

, number 286 on Forbes‘s list of the 400 richest Americans. In November, as home foreclosure rates reached Depression-era heights, Bacon spent $175 million on a 171,000-acre ranch in Colorado–the largest amount ever paid for a piece of residential property.   MAX FRASER

HILLARY’S FEMINIST MOMENT:

Five months ago, in what now feels like a different epoch,

Hillary Clinton

was addressing a packed auditorium in New Hampshire when two men suddenly began shouting, “Iron my shirt!” The air went out of the room, but as soon as the miscreants had been tossed out, Clinton shot back with relish: “Ah, the remnants of sexism–alive and well.” The crowd went wild. As I sat in the auditorium it struck me that it was the most rhetorically alive I’d seen her during the entire campaign.

Fast-forward to Saturday, June 7, when Clinton officially suspended her campaign and endorsed

Barack Obama

. The speech has been praised as the best of her campaign (if not her career). “I am a woman,” she said. “Like millions of women, I know there are still barriers and biases out there, often unconscious, and I want to build an America that respects and embraces the potential of every last one of us.”

Clinton’s campaign did not emphasize her gender for most of the seventeen months she was running. “When I was asked what it means to be a woman running for President, I always gave the same answer,” she told the crowd at the National Building Museum, “that I was proud to be running as a woman but I was running because I thought I’d be the best President.” It’s hard to second-guess this tactical choice, since the path of a serious woman presidential contender is an uncharted one. Many of Clinton’s supporters have noted, rightly, that she was operating under gendered constraints, like making voters believe a woman could be commander in chief, to name the most obvious. All of that said, the campaign began to embrace a kind of feminist core as the race went on, and it culminated in Clinton’s final speech, which was, without a doubt, the most unabashed feminist address in the history of presidential politics.

Running for President can be a radicalizing experience.

Al Gore

ran as a safe centrist, and in the wake of his illegitimate defeat he became an outspoken and full-throated progressive voice.

Howard Dean

began as a DLC governor and ended up an antiwar icon and the man who has reinvested the DNC with grassroots energy. Clinton laid out her mission going forward in strong terms: “We must make sure that women and men alike understand the struggles of their grandmothers and their mothers, and that women enjoy equal opportunities, equal pay and equal respect…. Let us resolve and work toward achieving very simple propositions: there are no acceptable limits, and there are no acceptable prejudices in the twenty-first century in our country.” That may not have been the raison d’être of her campaign, but recent history proves that sometimes the most ambitious goals can be sought only outside the confines of presidential politics.   CHRISTOPHER HAYES

OUR MOLLY:

Nation columnist

Katha Pollitt

has been named a finalist for

The Molly

National Journalism Prize

, named after the famous leftist wit and writer

Molly Ivins

. Established by The Texas Observer, Ivins’s longtime home, the Molly recognizes journalism that challenges conventional wisdom and embodies the “intelligence, deep thinking and passionate wit that marked Molly’s work”–which Katha’s 2007 columns demonstrate in spades.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x