Toggle Menu

NYC Students Meet at City Hall to Debate Guns

As millions around the world participated in the March for Our Lives, 35 children aged 8 to 10 took turns sharing their reasons for restricting gun use.

Brandon Jordan

March 26, 2018

New York City Hall(Photo courtesy of Momos at en.wikipedia, CC 3.0)

This article is reposted with permission from Kings County Politics.

This story was produced for Student Nation, a section devoted to highlighting campus activism and student movements from students in their own words. For more Student Nation, check out our archive. Are you a student with a campus activism story? Send questions and pitches to Samantha Schuyler at samantha@thenation.com. The Student Nation program is made possible through generous funding from The Puffin Foundation.

As millions around the world participated in last Saturday’s March for Our Lives rally, about 35 children aged 8 to 10 participated in a debate at City Hall on whether guns should be restricted.

The discussion was organized by the Brooklyn chapter of Jack and Jill of America, a mother-led organization that engages in community service. Michelle Cornegy, whose husband is City Council member Robert Cornegy Jr. (Bedford-Stuyvesant, Northern Crown Heights), highlighted how the organization offers resources for children of color. The councilmember made an appearance at the event to support recent anti–gun violence efforts.

“Our mission is to grow and to grow leaders,” she said.

Current Issue

View our current issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Last year, children debated whether circuses should keep using performing animals. The debate featured a special appearance from Mayor Bill de Blasio. This year’s topic was chosen because of the recent debate around guns.

After several kids volunteered for the side for which they would argue, they began to write their speeches—with their parents offering guidance—on large index cards for the discussion held that afternoon. A few parents offered their help, such as Kenya Johnson.

Johnson found the event format helpful in teaching kids issues at an early age, especially for her special-needs child, Jeremiah.

“It’s wonderful that children in America have gotten civically engaged, and we could only hope that it makes a difference,” she said.

Tracy Wright, another mother, noted that her son Kaden already had an idea for his position for why guns are harmful. She too found the debate format helpful as an educative tool for children to express their opinions.

“I hope this is the seed for kids to come to City Hall and talk about issues,” she said.

US Representative Yvette Clarke (D-Crown Heights, Flatbush, East Flatbush, Brownsville, Sheepshead Bay) stopped by to deliver some comments to the students before the short debate. She asked them questions on a variety of topics, including where the House of Representatives is located and how they might work for change in their schools.

Independent journalism relies on your support


With a hostile incoming administration, a massive infrastructure of courts and judges waiting to turn “freedom of speech” into a nostalgic memory, and legacy newsrooms rapidly abandoning their responsibility to produce accurate, fact-based reporting, independent media has its work cut out for itself.

At The Nation, we’re steeling ourselves for an uphill battle as we fight to uphold truth, transparency, and intellectual freedom—and we can’t do it alone. 

This month, every gift The Nation receives through December 31 will be doubled, up to $75,000. If we hit the full match, we start 2025 with $150,000 in the bank to fund political commentary and analysis, deep-diving reporting, incisive media criticism, and the team that makes it all possible. 

As other news organizations muffle their dissent or soften their approach, The Nation remains dedicated to speaking truth to power, engaging in patriotic dissent, and empowering our readers to fight for justice and equality. As an independent publication, we’re not beholden to stakeholders, corporate investors, or government influence. Our allegiance is to facts and transparency, to honoring our abolitionist roots, to the principles of justice and equality—and to you, our readers. 

In the weeks and months ahead, the work of free and independent journalists will matter more than ever before. People will need access to accurate reporting, critical analysis, and deepened understanding of the issues they care about, from climate change and immigration to reproductive justice and political authoritarianism. 

By standing with The Nation now, you’re investing not just in independent journalism grounded in truth, but also in the possibilities that truth will create.

The possibility of a galvanized public. Of a more just society. Of meaningful change, and a more radical, liberated tomorrow.

In solidarity and in action,

The Editors, The Nation

Clarke understood how important it was to ensure passage of legislation in response to the shootings happening across the country. She noted that in 2003, while she was a City Council member, an individual fatally shot her Brooklyn colleague James Davis.

“This man was loved by everybody, and his life was taken by gun violence. So when I go to Washington, DC, I get upset as well,” Clarke said.

Cornegy also commended the children for their efforts not only in forming their arguments, but also in informing public leaders like himself on issues like gun control.

“What you do here today actually informs the way I perform, the way the congresswoman performs on your behalf,” he said.

Before the short debate, the ninth-district leader said there does exist a demand to pass laws in Congress. She acknowledged the resistance from Republican lawmakers on bringing any gun-related legislation to the floor. Yet she felt hopeful a change would happen soon.

“As we build, as all of these folks who believe like we do, we know in the end we’re going to prevail. We’re going to bring legislation that’s going to change lives,” Clarke said.

The kids then took turns to share their reasons on whether guns should be restricted. Some argued that they could be used for self-defense, while those against highlighted that they present a danger to the public.

They were unanimous and enthusiastic in supporting at least one issue—eating pizza after the debate.

Brandon JordanTwitterBrandon Jordan is a freelance journalist whose work has appeared in City Limits, Waging Nonviolence, In These Times, and more.


Latest from the nation