Obama’s Budget: More Guns, Less Butter

Obama’s Budget: More Guns, Less Butter

Obama’s Budget: More Guns, Less Butter

A budget plan that cuts over 200 federal programs and expands military spending reveals the president’s misplaced priorities.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

When President Obama announced his budget plan this month, he proposed cutting or eliminating over 200 federal programs and expanding military spending and funding for the construction of nuclear power plants. The Nation‘s John Nichols joined Democracy Now! today to talk about the president’s misplaced priorities.

The proposal includes cutting half of the funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance program, money that will have to be made up for by already-strained state, county and municipal governments, Nichols says.

“The LIHEAP program is not some… benefit that the government throws out if it’s got a little extra money. It’s life and death. This is something that decides whether people can heat their homes in frigid climates. It’s also something that really decides whether communities can maintain their services. Remember, we’re talking about places that don’t have a choice on whether you’re going to use home heating oil, whether you’re going to use heating oil to heat your schools and your community centers. You have to do it," he says.

When he announced the program, Obama explained that these cuts will bring domestic discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president.

“I wish President Obama would remember what Dwight Eisenhower said about defense spending versus domestic spending. Dwight Eisenhower said, every time you buy a bomb, every time you pay for a bullet, that’s money that comes out of building a school or putting a roof on a house. I just think the President is making a lot of wrong choices here,” Nichols says.

Sara Jerving

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x