Olmert:: The End of Greater Israel

Olmert:: The End of Greater Israel

Okay, we all wish outgoing Israeli Prime Minister Olmert had said this stuff during his time in office. Still, it’s stunning. Here are the direct quotes, via the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharanot and Y-Net:

“The notion of a Greater Israel no longer exists, and anyone who still believes in it is deluding themselves.

“Forty years after the Six Day War ended, we keep finding excuses not to act. This isn’t doing Israel any good. The international community in starting to view Israel as a future binational state. We can prove that we have been more creative than the other side through the years, and that they have been more obstinate, but as usual, we will win the debate by losing sight of what’s really important.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Okay, we all wish outgoing Israeli Prime Minister Olmert had said this stuff during his time in office. Still, it’s stunning. Here are the direct quotes, via the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharanot and Y-Net:

“The notion of a Greater Israel no longer exists, and anyone who still believes in it is deluding themselves.

“Forty years after the Six Day War ended, we keep finding excuses not to act. This isn’t doing Israel any good. The international community in starting to view Israel as a future binational state. We can prove that we have been more creative than the other side through the years, and that they have been more obstinate, but as usual, we will win the debate by losing sight of what’s really important.

“We can always find very good reasons for not doing things now, and for why we would be better off postponing everything to a later date. We refuse to face reality. Time is not on Israel’s side, not because our cause isn’t just, but because time has its own repercussions.

“I admit – this hasn’t always been my position. In the past I’ve said – and I said it to (Labor Chairman Ehud) Barak at the time – that what he agreed to in Camp David was wrong.

“I used to believe that everything from the Jordan River bank to the Mediterranean Sea was ours. After all, dig anywhere and you’ll find Jewish history. But eventually, after great internal conflict, I’ve realized we have to share this land with the people who dwell here – that is if we don’t want to be a binational state.

“No other nation is as strong and no other nation in the Middle East can rival us. The strategic threats we face have nothing to do with where we draw our borders.

“We can argue about every single detail, but when we finally hash out an agreement we may find we no longer have the international community’s backing, or a partner for that matter. We’ll be left with nothing but the feeling that once again, as for the past 40 years, we were right.

“I’m not kidding myself. I know the change I’m talking about won’t rid us of all the threats. We’ll still be facing Palestinians threats across the security fence, since they have no real security establishment, but we can deal with all of that and we would be better off dealing with it than cementing the notion of a binational state in the international community’s mind.

“The public knows we can’t put it off. Voluntary evacuation is a part of that realization. A day will come, probably sooner than some are willing to admit, that all of us will be willing to embrace the same solutions that some of us are rejecting right now.

“Israel has always known how to make wise decisions and how to protect itself. We have to ask ourselves is losing a hill here or there, is worth forfeiting the chance to achieve something. This is why I say that this is the time to discuss the evacuation-compensation (bill). We have to keep pushing it, and eventually bring it before the government.

“This is the time to push for peace with both the Palestinians and the Syrians. If we know how to do that, other Arab countries, which are yet to acknowledge us in public, will soon follow.”

It’s caused a storm of controvery in Israel, especially since Olmert also called for giving East Jerusalem to the Palestinians.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x