On Bill de Blasio’s Endorsement of Hillary Clinton

On Bill de Blasio’s Endorsement of Hillary Clinton

On Bill de Blasio’s Endorsement of Hillary Clinton

The mayor’s endorsement is understandable, but it could take pressure off Clinton to embrace progressive positions on economic issues.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Recently, Mayor Bill de Blasio formally endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. “We have to restore the middle class,” the mayor said in an interview on Morning Joe, “and Hillary Clinton knows how to do it, will get it done, and has a progressive platform that speaks to all the changes we need, including progressive taxation.” The mayor obviously feels pressure because he is, at once, a longtime associate of Clinton and one of the nation’s leading advocates for a serious approach to issues of income inequality, and economic and social injustice. By making this endorsement, de Blasio gets on the Clinton team and closer to the inner circle (although that circle includes folks closely allied with some of his rivals). That’s good for him, good for New York, good for an urban agenda.

But there’s a downside. Clinton has already shown a willingness to move on big economic issues (trade, banks, etc.), and it is because of pressure not just from Senator Bernie Sanders but also from Senator Elizabeth Warren and people like de Blasio. Keeping that pressure on at this point is critical. If Clinton decides she has done enough, she may well not move on any more issues. She may begin to backtrack. That’s not just bad for the issues, it’s bad for Clinton. By waiting, de Blasio would have given space to Sanders, who, the mayor said, “has moved the discussion of this country in a very productive way,” and to progressive mayors and others to keep the pressure on. Why not endorse Clinton when it is clear that she has moved even more vigorously toward progressive economic positions that can excite and mobilize voters?

I believe there is still room for Clinton to move, and while understanding the tough position Mayor de Blasio is in, I think it would have been wise, tactically and morally, to keep the pressure on for that movement.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x