In Our Orbit

In Our Orbit

“Ifavor unconditional withdrawal from the territories,” says a former head of Israel’s security service, rather starkly, given his background. It’s from an interview in this edited collection o

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

“Ifavor unconditional withdrawal from the territories,” says a former head of Israel’s security service, rather starkly, given his background. It’s from an interview in this edited collection of short opinion pieces from Israel and the occupied territories. “Israeli society, top to bottom, is sinking into confusion,” says the official, Ami Ayalon. “There are no reference points.” It might be said instead that the standard reference points don’t tell the whole story, which is the corrective purpose of this reader, edited by Nation copy chief Roane Carey and former intern Jonathan Shainin. The editors have recruited a diverse assemblage of correspondents on various aspects of politics, culture and the dirty war being conducted on both sides. Most, unsurprisingly, score Ariel Sharon heavily–Tanya Reinhart, a professor and columnist for Yediot Ahronot, says Sharon’s plans are for “the second half of 1948,” i.e., expulsion; Michael Ben-Yair, attorney general in several governments in the 1990s, observes that “the Six-Day War was forced upon us; however, the war’s seventh day, which began on June 12, 1967 and has continued to this day, is the product of our choice. We enthusiastically chose to become a colonial society.” Philosopher Adi Ophir says of the intifada, “The occupied party’s resistance to the occupier is its moral right. Its violent resistance to the occupation is a direct result of the violence of the occupation…. The Palestinians have no choice but to resist.” We hear from an activist about lying in front of tanks (“We don’t bother to argue with [the soldiers] or explain”) and from former soldiers themselves (“All the IDF’s operations in the territories are approaching the red line…. I cannot judge what is legal and what constitutes a war crime,” says a onetime air force pilot). And Amira Hass’s “What Kind of War Is This?”, a report from Jenin, lucidly answers its own question.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x