Palin’s “Mamma Grizzlies” Video is No Obama “Yes We Can”

Palin’s “Mamma Grizzlies” Video is No Obama “Yes We Can”

Palin’s “Mamma Grizzlies” Video is No Obama “Yes We Can”

Is Sarah Palin’s video a preview for a possible campaign in 2012? Nation correspondent Ari Melber explains why she hasn’t crossed over into social media organizing just yet.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

When Sarah Palin’s new video was viewed 368,000 times, was anyone thinking, "That’s the woman I want for president"? Sara Terry, host of PRI’s To The Point, puts that question to Nation correspondent Ari Melber, who answers, not likely. Only two percent of Palin’s Facebook following even "bothered bothered to check in with the video at all." And as Melber points out, "Most of the viewers actually came from traditional news sites, the lamestream media that she likes to critique."

Since most of the people watching the video are people who won’t be ponying up contributions, was the $200,000 she reportedly spent on political and image consultants worth it? Melber says yes, if her goal is just to stay in the media spotlight. But the money was not well spent for political organizing. Her video is no Obama "Yes We Can" campaign video, which generated 5 million views to her mere 300,000. If Palin wants to continue to be a television figure, she’s all set, but "as a candidate," Melber says, "she hasn’t crossed over yet."

—Melanie Breault

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x