Platform Fight: What About Guaranteed Health Care for All?

Platform Fight: What About Guaranteed Health Care for All?

Platform Fight: What About Guaranteed Health Care for All?

The Democratic Party’s draft platform offers little in the way of a serious promise of health-care reform.

The document reads as if it was written by the insurance industry rather than advocates for people who need health care.

But there are Democrats who refuse to compromise on this fundamental issue.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Democratic Party’s draft platform offers little in the way of a serious promise of health-care reform.

The document reads as if it was written by the insurance industry rather than advocates for people who need health care.

But there are Democrats who refuse to compromise on this fundamental issue.

At the urging of Progressive Democrats of America, almost 500 delegates to this month’s Democratic National Convention in Denver — led by House Judiciary Committee chair John Conyers, D-Michigan — have signed a declaration urging that the party commit in its platform to “guaranteed health care for all.”

Conyers is expected to be in Pittsburgh, along with Donna Smith, a “star” of the Michael Moore documentary “SiCKO” who serves with the congressman as a co-chair of PDA’s Healthcare NOT Warfare campaign.

They will be joined by activists from groups such as Healthcare for All Pennsylvania and the Western Pennsylvania Coalition for Single-Payer Healthcare.

Going into the weekend, PDA is asking delegates and party backers:

Question: Do you want the Democratic Party’s platform for 2008 to reflect “real” change we can believe in?

Question: Would you like a bit of the audacity of truth to complement that bit of hope?

As an answer, PDA and its allies are proposing a platform plank that makes no mention of the insurance industry but instead commits the party to five key principles:

* “Guarantee accessible health care for all.”

* “Create a single standard of high quality, comprehensive, and preventive health care for all.”

* “Allow freedom of choice of physician, hospital, and other health care providers.”

* “Eliminate financial barriers that prevent families and individuals from obtaining the medically necessary care they need.”

* “Allow physicians, nurses and other licenced health care providers to make health care decisions based on what is best for the health of the patient.”

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x