The Political Costs of Wal-Mart

The Political Costs of Wal-Mart

Cozying up to Wal-Mart may cost a New Jersey mayor his job.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Playing towel boy to Wal-Mart may cost Edison, New Jersey, Mayor George Spadoro his job. In a local battle over a proposed Wal-Mart store, the Democratic mayor has alienated many residents by taking the company’s side. (The neighbors aren’t pleased, either; an adjacent town is suing Edison over the project, fearing it will greatly worsen traffic problems.) Edison’s labor leaders don’t usually get involved in local Democratic primary politics, but the Teamsters, United Food and Commercial Workers and the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union are throwing their weight behind Spadoro’s opponent, Jun Choi. An education activist, Choi is the more progressive candidate, but his opposition to the Edison Wal-Mart–and support for more sustainable development–is giving his campaign a unique momentum. The primary is on June 7–if you live in the area, check out www.junchoi.com/volunteer.htm. Whoever wins the primary in this Democratic town is likely to be mayor.

If Spadoro does lose, his fate should serve as a cautionary tale to other politicians who are too spineless, misguided or downright whorish to stand up to Wal-Mart. Maryland Governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. falls in the latter category. Ehrlich, as Katrina vanden Heuvel reported a few weeks ago, is vetoing a bill that would force Wal-Mart either to increase spending on employee health insurance or reimburse the state’s taxpayers for the public-assistance expenses incurred by the company’s workers. Luckily the bill has enough votes in the legislature to override Ehrlich’s veto, but the material context for the governor’s pathetic antics hasn’t escaped scrutiny. As reported in the Washington Post, Ehrlich recently received a $4,000 contribution from Wal-Mart and was the beneficiary of a $1,000-per-head fundraiser hosted by the company. Wal-Mart Watch is urging people to sign a petition calling on him to send the money back to Wal-Mart.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x