On Political Talk Shows, Liberals Can’t Finish Their—

On Political Talk Shows, Liberals Can’t Finish Their—

On Political Talk Shows, Liberals Can’t Finish Their—

Is there data proving that liberals get interrupted more on political television? And who’s fault is that?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Does it ever seem like the liberal guests on political talk shows talk less and get interrupted more?

The halting, dominated liberal pundit is something of a cliché in pop culture, from the fake cable segments on 30 Rock to those subversively accurate Tom Tomorrow cartoons. Even putting aside Fox News, which just added to its in-house stable of repentant Democrats by hiring former Senator Evan Bayh, the more balanced debate shows tend to book more conservative guests, as Media Matters has documented, and then give the liberals a harder time.

I was thinking about this while watching the most recent McLaughlin Group, which pioneered today’s political talk. The show was considered brash, fast and revolutionary when it debuted in 1982. (President Reagan once likened it to Animal House, while toasting its influence.) Since then, of course, the show’s style has spread across cable news, along with its star guests like Pat Buchanan and Lawrence O’Donnell. Nowadays, The McLaughlin Group is almost quaint, prioritizing lengthy policy debates over most horse race crap, and teeing up segments with bright fonts reminiscent of a bake sale flyer. The exchanges are still pretty pointed, though, and while everyone brings their A-game, it feels like the liberal guests must fight harder to get a word in. To test that feeling, we counted up interruptions on the last show. It wasn’t even close.

The liberal guests were interrupted seven times.

The conservative guests were never interrupted successfully. (We counted interruptions as cutting in while a guest was talking and preventing them from continuing. An interjection that didn’t stop someone from talking was not counted.)

In terms of the breakdown, four of the interruptions of the liberal guests, Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift and Washington Post’s Ezra Klein, were by the host, John McLaughlin. Then the conservative guests, MSNBC’s Pat Buchanan and radio commentator Monica Crowley, added a few more interruptions of Klein. Clift was able to fight them off—she’s a veteran—and only succumbed to host-interruptions.

Now, the unavoidable critiques to this bloggy exercise are “Who cares?” since there are way important things happening in the world, and “So what, isn’t the McLaughlin Group always an interrupt-a-thon?

Well, political talk shows have an outsided influence on public debates, so it can matter that a seemingly balanced guest roster is skewed in how guests are treated. As for the second one, yeah, you got us, interruptions are especially intense on the show. In fact, this was a comparitively tame episode. I’ll close with a YouTube mashup someone made of moments in a 2008 show that were almost entirely cross-talk.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x