Poor Little Rich ‘Class Warfare’ Victim

Poor Little Rich ‘Class Warfare’ Victim

Poor Little Rich ‘Class Warfare’ Victim

Tea Party Congressman John Fleming doesn’t get why he should be taxed more on the $400,000 he has left after “feeding my family.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Add Louisiana Congressman John Fleming to the list of anti-tax Republicans who whine that getting by on a six- or seven-figure income isn’t as easy as you five-figure folk may think.

Back in July, Representative Sean Duffy (R-WI) shared that he struggles to pay his bills on his $174,000 Congressional salary (more than three times the median household income in his Wisconsin county). Today, on Chris Jansing’s MSNBC show, multimillionaire Fleming  explained in personal terms why Obama’s plan to raise taxes on millionaires is so unfair.

Fleming, whose flock of Subway shops and UPS stores brought in $6.3 million last year, said that after expenses he nets about $600,000—and “by the time I feed my family, I have maybe $400,000 left over to invest in new locations, upgrade my locations, buy more equipment.” 

“So,” Jansing asked, “you’re saying that if you have to pay more in taxes you would get rid of some of those employees?” Fleming never answered the question.

She tried again: “You do understand, Congressman, that the average person out there who’s making forty, fifty, sixty thousand dollars a year, when they hear that you have only $400,000 left over, it’s not exactly a sympathetic position.”

“Well, again,” he said, “class warfare’s never created a job.”

Neither have record-low taxes on the rich, as ten years of Bush tax cuts should have proven once and for all. Finally, in his speech today on why we must raise taxes on the wealthy to reduce the deficit, Obama came up with just the right, succinct retort: “This isn’t class warfare. It’s math.”

Watch:

 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x