In Praise of John Murtha

In Praise of John Murtha

With 457 blunt-spoken words, John Murtha broke the spell that had held the country captive to the misguided adventure in Iraq. It suddenly became respectable to talk of a pullout. It was his finest moment: For the first time, there is hope this war may end.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

When John Murtha, Democratic Repesentative from Pennsylvania, appeared on our television screens, what he had to say was shocking–an old guard type declaring America must get itself out of Iraq and the war. In 457 words, he stood the country up and made it blink as he told the other of the House of Representatives, “Our military is suffering. The future of our country is at risk. We can not continue on the present course. It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf Region.”

That was a shock and Murtha himself was a shock, a man from another era, from an America most of us may have heard about but have not visited.

At 73 he has an Irish working-class accent of a kind which has all but died out. It speaks of grit and iron and hard times–and there have been plenty of those in his Pennsylvania Congressional district, where the bituminous coal industry went down when Murtha was a young man and where the steel industry went down when Murtha was a middle-aged man, and in between there were two wars, both of which he signed up for and served in.

Murtha joined the Marines for the Korean War, came back to go to college on the GI Bill of Rights and joined the Marines again for Vietnam. He is a retired colonel in the Reserves, a citizen soldier who stayed close to the armed services in life and in Congress, where for 30 years he has been on committees having to do with defense. When he spoke out last week, it was for love of country and for love of its soldiers.

“I have been visiting our wounded troops at Bethesda and Walter Reed hospitals almost every week since the beginning of the war,” he said. “And what demoralizes them is going to war with not enough troops and equipment to make the transition to peace; the devastation caused by IEDs; being deployed to Iraq when their homes have been ravaged by hurricanes; being on their second or third deployment and leaving their families behind without a network of support.” Visiting our wounded men and women once a week for two and a half years–that is not what most members of Congress do on their weekends.

He had a car wash business in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, a little city which lost about two-thirds of its population in the course of the last century. It must be a place that inspires more resolution than hope, where people’s dreams are tough and realistic, but not too tough, not impervious. When Murtha spoke in his curiously blunt yet polite manner his eyes watered.

Here is a man comfortable in his own skin. He knows who he is and what he has done and he can live with it. He does not explain himself or justify himself or apologize. He does not squirm, he does not wiggle. John Murtha does not display the guilt other Democratic politicians show when they talk about the war and their voting for it.

Over more than fifty years on the battlefield and in the Congress John Murtha has fought and worked. He has combat decorations, a building has been named after him, but his best service may have been this speech. “Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the US cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME!” he shouted.

In an instant, it had become respectable to talk about getting out, to offer plans for ending the war. Other politicians, previously cowed by the threat of being called quitters, began to speak up. On TV it was OK to have guests who said, “End it now.” The spell was broken and Murtha broke it. Of all that he has done, this was his finest moment. Now, for the first time, there is hope the war may soon be over.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x