Progress in Iran Talks: Can We Stop the War-Whooping Now?

Progress in Iran Talks: Can We Stop the War-Whooping Now?

Progress in Iran Talks: Can We Stop the War-Whooping Now?

By softening its rhetoric, the Western side has encouraged the Iranians to come to terms.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. (Reuters/Damir Sagolj.)

Saeed Jalili, the hardest of hardliners in Iran’s ongoing confrontation with the P5+1 over Tehran’s nuclear program, sounded downright upbeat after two days of talks in Almaty, Kazakhstan:

We consider these talks a positive step which could be completed by taking a positive and constructive approach and taking reciprocal steps.… We believe this is a turning point.

The two sides will meet March 18-19 in Istanbul, at a technical level, and the resume at the higher level back in Kazakhstan on April 5-6. The Western side, it appears, softened its demands, which encouraged the Iranian side. The new ideas from the P5+1, including the United States, were “more realistic” and “closer to the Iranian position,” said Jalili. According to The New York Times, the United States dropped its demand that Iran shut its underground enrichment facility at Fordo, which Iran has said that it would never do, and “agreed, in another apparent softening, that Iran could produce and keep a small amount of 20 percent enriched uranium for use in a reactor to produce medical isotopes.”

While the P5+1 did suggest that some, relatively minor sanctions on Iran might be lifted in a preliminary step, the relief offered was rather minor and inconsequential. According to Reuters: Western officials said the offer of sanctions relief included a resumption of trade in gold and precious metals. One diplomat said that lifting an embargo on imports of Iranian petrochemical products to Europe, if Iran responded, was also on the table. But a US official said the world powers had not offered to suspend oil or financial sanctions.

Still, asked about the prospects for an agreement, Iran’s Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said he was “very confident.”

Despite years of war-whooping and crisis-mongering on Iran, it’s beginning to sink in that Iran’s nuclear program doesn’t represent much of a threat. In fact, Iran has been taking steps on the ground to reassure the most hawkish observers, including Israel, that a bomb isn’t imminent. As the Times reported yesterday, in a passage notably less alarmist than is often the case:

At the same time, Iran has taken some of its stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium and converted it into reactor fuel, which cannot easily be turned back. The conversion means that Iran now has less of the uranium needed to make a bomb, reducing the sense of urgency among the six powers, and Israel, that its nuclear program needs to be slowed.

But the total Iranian stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium has nonetheless grown since November to 167 kilograms from 135 kilograms, according to the most recent I.A.E.A. report—closer to, if still significantly below, the 240 kilograms or 250 kilograms many experts consider necessary, once enriched further, to produce a nuclear weapon.

In other words, the stuff that Iran has is really hard to convert into bomb material, and anyway it doesn’t have enough of it.

Robert Dreyfuss recently returned from a trip to Tanzania, where he looked at the successes and limitations of foreign aid.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x