Repairing American Democracy Should Be a Central Issue in the 2016 Campaign

Repairing American Democracy Should Be a Central Issue in the 2016 Campaign

Repairing American Democracy Should Be a Central Issue in the 2016 Campaign

Three ways to fix US politics: Reduce big money, end gerrymandering, make it easier to vote.  

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nine years ago, when he announced his run for president on the steps of the Illinois state capitol in Springfield, Barack Obama declared that “the ways of Washington must change.”

But in addition to the gridlock and rancor in Washington, the American political system has gotten much worse since Obama was elected, through no fault of his own.

The Supreme Court allowed unlimited secret campaign contributions and gutted the Voting Rights Act. Twenty-one states passed new voting restrictions targeting the core of Obama’s political coalition. Gerrymandering reached new lows following the 2010 election.

Returning to Springfield to address the Illinois legislature yesterday, Obama offered three ideas for how to repair America’s broken political system.

1. Reduce the corrosive influence of money in politics.

“I don’t believe that money is speech or that political spending should have no limits,” Obama said, in contrast to the Citizens United decision. He noted that 150 families have spent as much on the presidential race as the rest of the country combined. He said he supported a constitutional amendment “to set reasonable limits on financial influence in American elections,” and called for more modest immediate reforms

2. Change the way congressional districts are drawn.  

Congress has a 10 percent approval rating, but 90 percent of incumbent members of Congress are reelected. That’s because so many of them represent safe, gerrymandered seats, which they often helped draw. “In America, politicians should not pick their voters; voters should pick their politicians,” Obama said. That means putting redistricting in the hands of independent actors without a partisan motive.

3. Make it easier, not harder, to vote.

The 2016 election is the first in 50 years without the full protections of the VRA. Sixteen states have new voting restrictions in place since Obama’s reelection. “Today, I ask every state in America to join us—reduce these barriers to voting,” Obama said. “Make it easier for your constituents to get out and vote.”

To improve voter participation, he called for states to adopt early voting, same-day voter registration, and automatic voter registration. He noted that states with same-day registration had the highest voter turnouts in 2012 and 2014. And he said that automatic voter registration, which has become law in Oregon and California, should be passed nationwide, which would add 27 million Americans to the voting rolls, according to Demos. Obama called for Illinois to take the lead. “Let’s make the Land of Lincoln a leader in voter participation,” he said.

These ideas sound like common sense, but have become surprisingly contentious. Obama noted that Republicans in the Democratic-controlled Illinois legislature applauded his remarks on gerrymandering but not on voting rights. “Now, this shouldn’t be controversial, guys,” Obama said. “You liked the redistricting thing, but not letting people vote. I should get some applause on that, too.”

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton have endorsed many of the solutions Obama advocated. But with the exception of Sanders’s loud opposition to the Citizens United decision, the issue of political reform has not been central to the presidential campaign. The Democratic candidates should make restoring American democracy a centerpiece of their campaigns, especially as a way to draw a contrast with the GOP candidates, who all support tough new voting restrictions.

There have been 13 presidential debates so far and no mention of voting rights, despite the fact that this is the first presidential election since the VRA was gutted. This week Democratic Congressmen Keith Ellison and Mark Pocan sent a letter to PBS urging the network to highlight the issue during tonight’s Democratic debate in Wisconsin. “Our democracy is strongest when everyone is able to participate and it is time to fulfill that promise to the American people,” they wrote.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x