Rising Opposition to War

Rising Opposition to War

At a press conference on January 20, only two days after thousands of Americans marched in cities and towns across the nation to oppose going to war with Iraq, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld warned

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

At a press conference on January 20, only two days after thousands of Americans marched in cities and towns across the nation to oppose going to war with Iraq, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld warned, “In the case of Iraq, we’re nearing the end of the long road and with every other option exhausted.” The next day George W. Bush, angered by the French foreign minister’s attack on Washington’s “impatience” with the inspection process, added, “This looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I’m not interested in watching it.”

The Bush Administration has been going hellbent down Rumsfeld’s road, ignoring the UN Security Council where not only France but Russia, China, Germany and others favor giving inspections a chance. Turkey, where 90 percent oppose war, is refusing to permit a large US force to launch an invasion from its soil. Ankara is preparing to host a summit meeting of regional powers seeking to pressure Iraq to cooperate with UN inspectors in an effort to head off a war. On the Continent popular opposition to a conflict runs around 70 to 80 percent.

While Rumsfeld accelerates the military buildup in the Gulf, antiwar forces have stepped up the mobilization at home. A quarter of a million or more protesters in Washington, San Francisco and elsewhere carried off the biggest antiwar demonstrations since the Vietnam era. This time national TV and papers across the country gave them full and respectful play. On February 15, more protests will be held here and all over the world.

The opposition encompasses a broad range of Americans, from pacifists and aging hippies to suburban moms and small-business people. They came from all over, boarding buses in Maine and Mississippi for the long drive to Washington. They came as individuals and as groups–including the National Council of Churches, Physicians for Social Responsibility, A Jewish Voice for Peace, US Labor Against the War (a coalition of more than sixty unions), United for Peace and Justice (a network of 150 groups), ANSWER (the coalition that organized the Washington march) and more. The Catholic bishops have spoken against war. Antiwar Republicans took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal. The January 18 rallies took place not just in cities but also in small towns: In Menomonie, Wisconsin (pop. 15,000), 200 antiwar demonstrators marched down Main Street. More than forty cities have passed resolutions condemning the war, most recently Chicago. On Capitol Hill, Senator Edward Kennedy’s blast at Bush’s Iraq policy signals a shift by Democrats to stronger opposition. In the House, a resolution to repeal last year’s war authorization was introduced and a letter calling on Bush to hold to a diplomatic approach is circulating and already signed by several members who voted for the original authorization for war.

The latest Washington Post/ABC poll shows 7 out of 10 Americans favor giving weapons inspectors more time. The latest Pew Research Center poll reports 53 percent of Americans believe Bush has failed to make the case for war. Many question why this Administration sees no alternatives to war in Iraq, where UN inspectors are on the job, while it explores diplomatic routes with North Korea. Others fear the impact of war and terrorism on the stagnant economy. More and more people are directly touched as sons and daughters, husbands and wives ship out to the Gulf.

We’re under no illusion that antiwar sentiment is sweeping the land. But doubts about Bush’s Iraq policy are broad and deep, and people are stirring. Administration officials should check the rearview mirror; something may be gaining on them.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x