Secret Arrests Are an Odious Concept

Secret Arrests Are an Odious Concept

Following the September 11 attacks, the federal government rounded up more than 1,000 people and detained them without revealing their identities.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Following the September 11 attacks, the federal government rounded up more than 1,000 people and detained them without revealing their identities. Last October, The Nation joined the Center for National Security Studies, the American Civil Liberties Union and twenty other groups in submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the Justice Department asking for information regarding the detainees–including their identities, the reasons for their detentions, and the names of their lawyers. The Justice Department refused the request, and the petitioners (including The Nation) took the government to court. On August 2, federal district court Judge Gladys Kessler issued a decision ordering the government to turn over much of the requested information. In a strongly-worded opinion, she noted, “Secret arrests are ‘a concept odious to a democratic society’…and profoundly antithetical to the bedrock values that characterize a free and open one such as ours.”

The decision was a major loss for the Ashcroft Justice Department, which had argued that it needed to engage in secret detentions in order to prosecute its portion of the war on terrorism. The judge ordered the government to reveal the names within fifteen days. Presumably, the department will appeal the decision before then.

Kessler’s entire decision and order are here in PDF format. Adobe Acrobat required.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x