Senate Clinches Healthcare Deal with Abortion Compromise

Senate Clinches Healthcare Deal with Abortion Compromise

Senate Clinches Healthcare Deal with Abortion Compromise

Democratic senators get to 60 votes on healthcare, striking a deal on abortion that is not quite as odious as the House’s restriction.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

 Amid a blizzard, Democratic senators struck a deal on healthcare, enabling Majority Leader Harry Reid to count 60 votes in favor of his bill. Talking Points Memo has a good run-down of the deal struck on abortion, which is not quite as odious as the House’s restriction (which banned any plan supported in any part by federal subsidy from including abortion coverage) but still involves what sounds like a very cumbersome work-around for anyone who wants coverage. In this compromise, anyone buying insurance with federal subsidy who wants a plan that covers abortion will have to send two separate checks to the insurance company, one earmarked for the portion of the private dollars that will go to cover abortion care. As TPM puts it, "If the plan costs $1000 a month, and the insurer plans to sequester $50 to put into a pool that covers abortions, you have to make one payment of $950 and a separate payment of $50." Sen. Ben Nelson, who had been the most intractable hold-out, said he’d support this version, as did pro-choice Sens. Barbara Boxer and Patty Murray.

 

Whether this compromise will be palatable to Rep. Bart Stupak and others in the House who supported the more stringent restriction, we’ll soon find out. As I’ve written before, pro-choice members of the House have said that they wouldn’t have voted for the House healthcare bill had they not been assured that the Stupak amendment would be taken out in conference committee. But, then again, the pro-choice movement was also assured that the Capps compromise was what would hold in the House. Assurances, we’ve learned, aren’t the same as a vote.

 

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x