Senate, House Approve Stimulus With Scant GOP Support

Senate, House Approve Stimulus With Scant GOP Support

Senate, House Approve Stimulus With Scant GOP Support

With the deciding vote cast by Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown — who interrupted preparations for his mother’s funeral to return to Washington — the U.S. Senate approved the $787 billion stimulus bill Friday night.

The measure passed the Senate with the votes of all members of the Senate Democratic caucus and three moderate Republicans — Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.

The three Republican votes made it possible to suggest that the bill President Obama will now sign was passed with a bipartisan majority.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

With the deciding vote cast by Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown — who interrupted preparations for his mother’s funeral to return to Washington — the U.S. Senate approved the $787 billion stimulus bill Friday night.

The measure passed the Senate with the votes of all members of the Senate Democratic caucus and three moderate Republicans — Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.

The three Republican votes made it possible to suggest that the bill President Obama will now sign was passed with a bipartisan majority.

But the truth is that there was very little in the way of genuine bipartisanship on display Friday.

Weeks of negotiation and compromising by Democrats — which saw a reasonably populist job creation and economic recovery bill turned into a tepid plan weighted down with conservative tax schemes — still did not gain a single vote from House Republicans for the stimulus plan.

Before Friday’s Senate vote, the House approved the measure by a 246-183 vote.

The votes in favor of the stimulus came from 246 Democrats.

The votes against it came from 176 Republicans and seven Democrats.

The only real shift from the vote on the original House bill — which included a great deal more spending for school construction, state aid and health care initiatives with the potential to create jobs and ease the pain of the economic downturn — involved a slight decline in Democratic opposition.

When the legislation was initially considered, 11 Democrats — most of the conservative Blue Dogs — vote “no.” On Friday, only seven Democrats voted against it. (Among the switchers was Tennessee Congressman Jim Cooper, a prominent Blue Dog. Another switcher was Pennsylvania Congressman Paul Kanjorski, the chair of the Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.)

In the Senate, there was no change — except that New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg, who was under consideration to become Obama’s Secretary of Commerce but has since withdrawn, cast an additional Republican vote against the stimulus.

So it was 57 Democrats and three Republicans voting “yes” in the Senate.

But, make no mistake, the votes by Collins, Snowe and Specter were the most meaningful.

Though they account for less than one percent of the overall membership of the Congress, Collins, Snowe and Specter have successfully redefined the legislation as something less than the majority Democrats proposed — and, unsettlingly, something less than may be needed to renew a sagging economy.

Collins, Snowe and Specter did not, however, succeed in convincing any Republicans that they changes they made were close enough to the opposition party’s generally agreed upon goal of doing little or nothing to address the current crisis.

For Americans who would like to do something most members of Congress have not, the bill — including scribbled changes — can be read here.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x