Seniors Fight Back Against Real-Life Death Panels

Seniors Fight Back Against Real-Life Death Panels

Seniors Fight Back Against Real-Life Death Panels

Across the country, seniors are fighting back against real-life death panels: cuts to their aid and closures of life-saving facilities.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Hundreds of New York City senior citizens will converge at the Emigrant Savings Bank building at 49-51 Chambers Street this Friday for the New York City Council Committee on Aging public budget hearing.

The seniors are opposing $39 million in cuts to their services, including Mayor Bloomberg’s plans to close seventeen more senior centers citywide (in addition to the twenty-six that were closed in 2010), and to significantly reduce services in the remaining centers.

The cuts are in addition to $50 million the mayor already cut from the Department for the Aging over the past three years—a cumulative total of about $90 million, a whopping 50% budget cut to senior services. 

Such services could end up costing the city more in the long run. For example, consider that taxpayers will end up supplementing costs for nursing home replacements, unless the mayor is planning to simply kick out seniors onto the streets, which will be free.

New York isn’t the only state where retirees are fighting back against austerity. In Maine, retired state workers and teachers rallied at the State House on Wednesday to protest changes to their pension benefits proposed by Governor LePage.

LePage’s proposal includes freezing cost of living increases for retired teachers and state workers for three years and reducing the cap on increases from 4 percent to 2 percent. The governor is also proposing about $200 million in tax cuts.

Jackie Roach of Oakland, who retired in 1994 after 38 years as a teacher, urged the crowd to call lawmakers and tell them to reject the proposed budget changes.

“It’s wrong for Gov. LePage to pay for his tax breaks for Maine’s wealthiest residents by cutting the pensions of Maine’s retired workers,” she said.

Seniors in Florida are enduring a particularly vicious assault from Governor Scott as they face millions of dollars in state budget cuts. Facilities are set for $187.5 million in cuts in addition to $2.1 billion in Medicare funding reductions over the next ten years.

Scott also issued significant cuts to hot meals programs that provide food to many of Miami’s most needy seniors, in addition to other cuts to homeless veterans, a council for deafness, a children’s hospital, cancer research, public radio, whooping-cough vaccines for poor mothers and aid for the paralyzed, all while requesting $30 million in corporate tax cuts.

These kinds of cuts will be devastating for seniors, according to the Coalition to Protest Senior Care.

Seventy percent of the funding lost would’ve paid staff salaries, forcing nursing homes to make tough decisions about their operating budgets once the cuts go into effect July 1.

Most of the staff positions on the line at certified nursing assistants like Palm Garden CNA Sheryle Chambers, who admits she’s more than just a nurses aid for residents when they move in.

“Because a lot of them come and drop them off and never see them again. So, we’re the family members they see on a daily basis,” she said. “The residents are going to suffer,

 

It is in large part because of these types of policies that Scott is currently one of the least popular governors in the United States, which may be why he’s taken to kicking out political opponents of his budget signing ceremonies.

Scott’s cronies consider the signing of public budgets “private events,” which is why Russ Abrams, a $60,000-a-year special assistant to Scott instructed a deputy to remove a group of Democrats from the signing.

 

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

 

 

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x