Strategic Reset: Movements React to Midterm Losses

Strategic Reset: Movements React to Midterm Losses

Strategic Reset: Movements React to Midterm Losses

November’s elections were a wake up call for movements around labor, the environment, immigration and education. Did activists tether themselves too closely to Democrats? What should they do now? A Nation special package.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This fall’s midterm elections were not only a setback for Democrats and the Obama administration. As a result of Republican gains, social movements for unions, public education, immigrants’ rights and the environment face a new and daunting landscape. Progressives may disagree about the extent to which the Democrats’ electoral defeat calls into question the strategies these movements had been pursuing. But all recognize that the new political reality requires a recalibration of tactics, a rethinking of priorities, a reassessment of goals and approaches to achieving them. In short, we need a strategic reset. Amid the rubble there are opportunities to be found, not least the chance for deep discussion. We hope this is the beginning of one.

Christian Parenti, "Green Strategy Now"
After the demise of climate legislation, environment groups are going local—and confrontational.

Jane McAlevey, "Making Unions Matter Again"
For too long, unions have mistaken access for power. They need to get back to organizing and activating members.

Daniel Altschuler, "Immigrant Activists Regroup"
Over the past decade, the immigrants’ rights movement has become a strong grassroots force. But it has not yet developed a unified legislative strategy that can shape the national debate.

Pedro Noguera, "Reframing the Education Debate"
Obama’s education policy is far too close to George W. Bush’s. Those of us who recognize the importance of public education can’t wait for the administration to lead the way.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x