Stuxnet Worm in Iran Could have Triggered ‘Chernobyl’

Stuxnet Worm in Iran Could have Triggered ‘Chernobyl’

Stuxnet Worm in Iran Could have Triggered ‘Chernobyl’

An intelligence report says the Stuxnet computer worm deployed by Israel and/or the US on Iran’s nuclear program could have had catastrophic consequences.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Eric Alterman may still be full of “joy” over the US and/or Israeli deployment of the Stuxnet computer worm to disable or upset Iran’s nuclear program. But an intelligence report obtained by AP says that the worm could have had catastrophic consequences. Reports AP:

The control systems of Iran’s Bushehr nuclear plant have been penetrated by a computer worm unleashed last year, according to a foreign intelligence report that warns of a possible Chernobyl-like disaster once the site becomes fully operational.

With control systems disabled by the virus, the reactor would have the force of a “small nuclear bomb,” it said.

“The minimum possible damage would be a meltdown of the reactor,” it says. “However, external damage and massive environmental destruction could also occur…similar to the Chernobyl disaster.”

Meanwhile, the British secretary of defense—they call it “defence” in England—has warned hyperbolically that Iran might have a bomb by 2012, i.e., next year, even though the Israelis themselves are saying that it will be 2015 at the earliest. The secretary, Liam Fox, criticized Meir Dagan, then the retiring head of the Mossad, who he said erred by suggesting that Iran is not that close to building a bomb. “We should therefore be very clear that it is entirely possible that Iran may be on the 2012 end of that spectrum and act in accordance with that warning,” said Liam Fox, who is no fox at all.

Like this Blog Post? Read it on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x