Tell the Democratic Party: We Need More Debates

Tell the Democratic Party: We Need More Debates

Tell the Democratic Party: We Need More Debates

With only six primary debates scheduled, the DNC is doing the party—and our democracy— a disservice.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket
What’s going on?

Twice already, we’ve tuned in to listen to Republicans vilify immigrants, condemn diplomacy, demonize gun control laws, and argue over who hates Planned Parenthood more. But the Democratic candidates have held only one debate so far—and they only have five more scheduled

For the 2008 primary, the DNC held nine debates before Labor Day. This year, only four of the six debates are being held before the February primaries. One of the debates is being held December 19, the Saturday before Christmas.

What’s more, any candidate who participates in a debate outside this absurdly limited schedule will be banned from participating in the DNC-sanctioned debates.

This is not only bad for candidates like Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders, who have to compete with Hillary Clinton’s name recognition and air of inevitability. The Republican debates have seen record ratings. So while the GOP’s extreme ideas on women’s healthcare, immigration, and foreign policy are getting an audience, the Democrats are losing a key opportunity to help frame the national conversation.

What can I do?

Join The Nation and RootsAction in telling the Democratic National Committee: we need more Democratic debates.

Learn More

The Nation’s writers have been calling for more debates since the party’s schedule was announced earlier this year. Back in September, Katrina vanden Heuvel explained why the party is mistaken if they think that frontrunner Hillary Clinton is better off without additional primary debates. John Nichols has also repeatedly called on the Democratic Party to change its stance, and to go even further by having Democratic and Republican candidates debate and allowing candidates to participate in debates not sanctioned by the DNC.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x