The Post-1991 World Order Is Crumbling—When Will the US Adjust?

The Post-1991 World Order Is Crumbling—When Will the US Adjust?

The Post-1991 World Order Is Crumbling—When Will the US Adjust?

Despite transformational events from Ukraine and the European Union to the Middle East, Washington refuses to re-think anything.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new US-Russian Cold War. Cohen argues that 2015 witnessed the crumbling of the US-led post-1991 international world order, many of the changes, for better or worse, pivoting around the New Cold War. While media attention is currently focused on the conflict over Syria and the Islamic State, Cohen points out that the political epicenter of the Cold War remains in Ukraine.

Cohen and Batchelor discuss attempts by opponents of a new US-Russian detente to thwart Secretary of State Kerry’s recent diplomatic agreements with President Putin, particularly in regard to Syria. The conversation then turns to positions taken by American presidential candidates. Cohen notes that in their most recent debate, Senator Sanders set out a foreign policy approach to Russia and international terrorism distinctly unlike that of Mrs. Clinton. Cohen also clarifies what Putin actually said about Donald Trump. Approving the message, not the messenger, Cohen hopes that Trump’s positive comments about Putin will result in a public discussion of the baselessly demonized Russian president as a needed US national-security partner.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x