Tracking the Superdelegates

Tracking the Superdelegates

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

With Hillary Clinton’s wins yesterday in Ohio and Texas, the Democratic presidential selection process is guaranteed to go on until at least the Pennsylvania primary on April 22 but likely much longer, possibly even into the summer.

The closeness of the race also raises the specter that the superdelegates, generally ignored and unknown, could play the pivotal role in selecting the eventual nominee. (Read Ari Berman’s recent magazine piece for the story of why a group of elite unpledged party operatives and elected officials not chosen by primary voters could be in position to decide the outcome.)

What the superdelegates should do, and whether they are bound by any principles, is now the subject of fierce debate. Geraldine Ferraro, in a New York Times op-ed, argued that the SDs should decide based on their own, personal sense of who would make the best candidate. John Lewis said he felt compelled to switch his allegiance from Clinton to Obama after his constituents voted overwhelmingly in favor of Obama, contending that SDs should reflect the will of the people.

Whatever you think, it’s critical to have accurate information on how the selection process is being conducted, a proposition on which the new Superdelegate Transparency Project was founded. A combined effort of DemConWatch, LiteraryOutpost, OpenLeft, HuffPost’s OffTheBus and Congresspedia–a project of the Sunlight Foundation and the Center for Media and Democracy, the STP calls itself “the most thorough, accurate and transparent reporting on how superdelegate endorsements compare to popular vote results and delegate counts–district by district.”

The effort is definitely the only citizen-led, grassroots attempt to bring transparency to the superdelegate process. STP also features profiles of and interviews with superdelegates, which have been donated to the site from HuffPost’s OffTheBus team of citizen journalists. The aim of the project is to open up the Democratic nomination process, and to gauge what effect the superdelegates have on the nomination. Want to help out? Click here.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x