“We’re Well Past 216”: Dems Have Votes to Pass Reform

“We’re Well Past 216”: Dems Have Votes to Pass Reform

“We’re Well Past 216”: Dems Have Votes to Pass Reform

Stupak endorses bill as raucous debate moves forward and vote approaches.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Congressman Bart Stupak, the Michigan Democrat who had resisted backing the health-care reform legislation because he argued that was not specific enough in limiting federal funding for abortions, announced Sunday afternoon that he will vote for the bill.

Stupak’s move assured that Democrats have more than the needed 216 votes to win House approval for the landmark legislation.

“We’ve been able to come up with an agreement to respect the sanctity of life on health care reform,” Stupak said at an afternoon press conference, where he was joined by several Democrats who until Sunday had refused to back the bill.

The key congressman’s decision to vote “yes” came after President Obama issued an executive order affirming that existing ban on the spending of federal funds to cover the costs of abortions would be maintained. (Under the more than three-decades old Hyde amendment, federal money cannot pay for abortions.)

The National Organization for Women objected that the president had broken faith with American women — offering a reminder that the legislation falls far short of what progressives who backed Obama’s election had hoped for.

But the moves assure that Obama and the Democrats will pass a health-care bill.

Stupak told a Sunday afternoon press conference that the the deal that led to the executive order would win “eight of nine” additional Democratic votes for the health-care reform bill.

Confirming the the fight was done — except for the voting — Stupak said of the forces backing the legislation: “We’re well past 216.”

Stupak’s announcement, which was made amid a flurry of endorsements of the legislation, came as the House debate over final passage of bill opened with a measure of chaos Sunday. An anti-reform heckler was removed from the chamber’s gallery and Democratic leaders chided Republican colleagues for egging on disruptive protesters.

Congressman Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts, shouted at Congressman Roy Blunt, the Missouri Republican and former House Majority Leader who remains a key leader of his party’s forces, to get GOP members to stop acting out. “That’s why you get this kind of virulence and hatred,” declared Frank.

It was a raucous but not particularly unsettling start to what could be a long afternoon — and evening — of debating and voting.

Where do things stand?

It was always unlikely — extremely unlikely if you know anything about the woman’s political instincts — that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, would have decided to go ahead with Sunday’s session if she did not have the 216 votes needed to pass the legislation.

And evidence that things are going Pelosi’s way came Sunday with Stupak’s announcement.

The Michigan congressman’s move followed an announcement by Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur, an Ohio Democrat who had been a holdout, that she would vote for the bill.

No ally of Pelosi, Kaptur had tweaked the leadership on the issue of abortion rights, pressing the speaker and her team to allow a vote on specific restrictions against federal funding of reproductive-health services.

Speaking to a local television station in Toledo, Kaptur confirmed she would back the legislation that she said “addresses a serious problem before the country today.”

Kaptur said she received promises Saturday that abortion foes in the House Democratic Caucus would with President Obama to ensure “that existing law is maintained.”

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x