What Ron Paul Brings to the 2012 Race: An Old-Right Orthodoxy That Often Aligns Him With Progressives

What Ron Paul Brings to the 2012 Race: An Old-Right Orthodoxy That Often Aligns Him With Progressives

What Ron Paul Brings to the 2012 Race: An Old-Right Orthodoxy That Often Aligns Him With Progressives

The sort-of libertarian congressman from Texas challenges more Republican dogma on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Pentagon spending, free trade, civil liberties, bank bailouts and Fed secrecy than does Barack Obama.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As Ron Paul prepares to mount his third campaign for the presidency, he does so from a dramatically better position than he was is at the beginnings of his previous bids.

In 1988, he was a Libertarian shouting from the political wilderness about the supposed sameness of Republican George H.W. Bush and Democrat Michael Dukakis—and not getting much notice.

In 2008, he was a maverick Republican wedged into debates with a crew of credible if uninspired partisans such as John McCain and Rudy Giuliani. He got notice, mostly from Giuliani, who became increasingly obsessed with the fact that a dissemter from GOP economic and foreign policy orthodoxy had been allowed on the debate stage. But again, Paul was denied the sort of coverage and respect accorded contenders who echoed the party line as dictated by Dick Cheney and the neocon taskmasters.

In 2012, Paul runs as an increasingly iconic Republican with a good many more allies inside the party and a claim to fame that most of his fellow contenders for the GOP nod lack: a job as a congressman that places him in the thick of national debates. Perhaps most significantly, he uses his position in the Congress to embrace positions that, while at odds with Republican leaders, raise the concerns of millions of Americans from across the ideological spectrum.

That does not mean that he is going to secure the Republican nomination. The Grand Old Party does not have a history of nominating candidates who take stands that aren’t preapproved by the Wall Street bankers and corporate CEOs who pay the party’s tab—and kindly pick up some of the bills for the Democrats, as well.

With that said, however, there are plenty of reasons why progressives might welcome Paul to the 2012 race.

One need not support the man or his overall platform—which deviates from classic libertarianism on a number of vital social issues  and his antipathy toward entitlement programs makes Paul Ryan sound like a liberal—to recognize the value added to the Republican presidential debates, and the broader discourse, by a candidate who:

1. Has consistently opposed the undeclared wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, siding with Congressman Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, and other members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus in struggles to hold Democratic and Republican presidents to account for unlawful and unnecessary war-making.

2. Has worked alongside Congressman Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts, to make the case for deep cuts in the Pentagon budget.

3. Has regularly voted with Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, and other labor-aligned Democrats in opposition to free-trade pacts that leave workers jobless, shutter factories, batter working-class communities and make a mockery of democratic governance in the US and abroad.

4. Has joined former US Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin, and Michigan Congressman John Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, in raising all the right questions about the Patriot Act, domestic surveillance and abuses of civil liberties.

5. Has partnered with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, a chamber’s steadiest advocate of economic justice and social-democratic ideals, to demand transparency and accountability from the Federal Reserve.

6. Has sided with Kaptur. Feingold, Sanders and other critics of bank bailouts that were backed by both President Obama and the Republican leadership of the House and Senate.

7. Has mounted a stronger defense of WikiLeaks and press freedom than any member—Democrat or Republican, liberal or conservative.

Ron Paul is not a progressive. He takes stands on abortion rights and a number of other issues that disqualify him from consideration by most moderates and liberals. But he cannot be dismissed as just another robotic Republican. Indeed, he is more inclined to challenge to Republican orthodoxy on a host of foreign and fiscal policy issues than Barack Obama. As such, he brings a dimension to the presidential race that would otherwise be missing. And, at some point in some debate, he is going to make Mitt Romney scream.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x