What Turnout Means

What Turnout Means

Travel day for me, so light posting. (O’Hare on the day after Mother’s day is not a place you want to be)

But if you read one piece of campaign commentary today, read this fascinating piece by Josh Kalven over at the excellent Progress Illinois.

In the piece, Kalven interviews the myserious Kos diarist Poblano. Poblano has developed his own statistical model of turnout that has proven remarkably accurate in predicting the results in primary contests. In the piece, Kalven has Poblano use his model to project what kind of electoral college gains Obama would reap in the general for every 10% he increases African American turnout. The results are eye-opening:

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Travel day for me, so light posting. (O’Hare on the day after Mother’s day is not a place you want to be)

But if you read one piece of campaign commentary today, read this fascinating piece by Josh Kalven over at the excellent Progress Illinois.

In the piece, Kalven interviews the myserious Kos diarist Poblano. Poblano has developed his own statistical model of turnout that has proven remarkably accurate in predicting the results in primary contests. In the piece, Kalven has Poblano use his model to project what kind of electoral college gains Obama would reap in the general for every 10% he increases African American turnout. The results are eye-opening:

Recently, Progress Illinois and the SEIU Illinois Council (which sponsors us) asked Poblano to examine how incremental increases in turnout among certain demographic groups would affect the outcome of an Obama-McCain contest. What he found underscores the importance of voter mobilization this year. (You can find Poblano’s own analysis here.)

Take the African-American vote, for example. With each 10 percent increase in black turnout nationwide, Obama gains an average of 13 electoral votes, while his chance of winning jumps by about eight points.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x