Why Didn’t Wisconsin’s Teaching Assistants’ Association Endorse Any Candidate in Today’s Election?

Why Didn’t Wisconsin’s Teaching Assistants’ Association Endorse Any Candidate in Today’s Election?

Why Didn’t Wisconsin’s Teaching Assistants’ Association Endorse Any Candidate in Today’s Election?

This Tuesday, as Wisconsinites voted in primaries to replace Governor Scott Walker and five other statewide office holders, the union of graduate students at the heart of the 2011 Capitol protests, stood apart from their union fellows, and refused to endorse any candidate.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This Tuesday, as Wisconsinites went to the polls to vote in primaries to replace Governor Scott Walker and five other statewide office holders, the union of graduate students at the heart of the 2011 Capitol protests that sparked the recall stood apart from their union fellows and refused to endorse any candidate.

The Teaching Assistants’ Association (TAA) the union of graduate student workers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, kicked off the 2011 Capitol protests. Their Valentine’s Day rally and their call to keep the Capitol open for public testimony on Governor Walker’s proposed attacks on union rights, public education and public services led to the recall movement that has forced the governor, lieutenant governor and four state senators to face new elections. The process began this Tuesday, as Wisconsinites went to the polls to vote in primaries. The TAA was in the thick of things again, but not because they were rallying people behind their chosen candidate. Rather, because the union had refused to do just that.

Salon’s Josh Eidelson summarized the points of contention this way:

At issue is whether the union should support a candidate who hasn’t pledged to restore cuts to public workers’ wages and benefits — one of the criteria the TAA originally listed as a a prerequisite for an endorsement. [Former Dane County Executive Kathleen] Falk, who entered the race in January, is the only candidate who has pledged to veto any budget that doesn’t restore collective bargaining rights. But she also frequently touts the $10 million in concessions that she secured in negotiations with local unions as county executive. [Milwaukee Mayor Tom] Barrett…is more problematic when it comes to cuts: Last year, as the debate over collective bargaining raged, he told a conservative radio host that he opposed Walker’s collective bargaining changes but supported his proposed cuts.

Falk was the union favorite, securing endorsements from WEAC, AFSCME, SEIU and the TAA’s parent union, AFT-Wisconsin. In debating an endorsement, the TAA fell into divided camps with the union’s Political Education Committee and one of two co-president’s voting to get behind Falk. Co-president Adrienne Pagac opposed making an endorsement. I caught up with Pagac this weekend, where she spoke at a conference convened by Labor Notes. Unions have developed a well-oiled machine to get their members to the polls. What they haven’t built is the on-the-ground might to produce candidates who share their priorities, she argued. The TAA majority refused to split their union priorities from their priorities as Wisconsinites, equally affected by slashes to public budgets as they are to attacks on public workers’ rights. Here are Pagac’s comments just days before Tuesday’s vote.

Where Wisconsin is already, the nation is headed soon, namely into an election. Substitute TAA for Occupy, or the radical movement of your choice—and you have the quadrennial quandary for radicals in a nutshell. Or, possibly, a cheesehead hat.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x