Why Romney Bashes Obama’s Harvard Education

Why Romney Bashes Obama’s Harvard Education

Why Romney Bashes Obama’s Harvard Education

 Romney has deeper ties to Harvard than Obama. But since when did shameless pandering have to make sense? 

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Mitt Romney is the archetypal Harvard alum. He went there for law school and business school. After graduating he joined the Boston Consulting Group, which heavily recruits Harvard MBAs. He went on to amass a fortune through consulting and private equity work in the Boston area.

As Benjy Sarlin notes in TPM, “Three of his sons attended Harvard and he has donated over $50,000 to the university. His campaign lists over a dozen advisers with Harvard ties.” Romney has also publicly sung Harvard’s praises. With his stiffly coiffed hair and habit of using awkward jargon, Romney is the epitome of America’s academically credentialed business elite.

And that’s the problem. Romey is an uncomfortable fit for a political party deeply suspicious of intellectualism and cosmopolitanism. So he has made bashing President Obama’s ties to Harvard–Obama also attended Harvard Law School–a feature of his stump speeches. He regularly tosses out the meaningless complaint that Obama takes “advice from the Harvard faculty lounge.” Sometimes he even does so the day before bragging that a Harvard professor supports one of his own plans. The slur is fundamentally silly, and all the more so coming from Romney.

On Thursday, as Sarlin reports, he went after Obama for having maybe spent “too much time at Harvard.” Romney, of course, spent even more time there than did Obama. (Romney’s combined degree program was four years, Obama spent three years in law school.)

But if you think spouting such laughably hypocritical nonsense is bad for Romney, think again. Following the mantra, often attributed to Karl Rove, that a politician must attack his opponent’s strength, Romney is trying to neutralize Obama’s biographical advantages.

Obama’s Harvard pedigree, of course, plays differently than Romey’s. Romney is the son of an auto executive, George Romney, who became governor of Michigan. Going to an expensive graduate school comes across as merely fulfilling his life’s destiny. That is all the more true because Romney only used his degrees to make piles of money. Obama, the bi-racial son of a single mother, went to Harvard after working as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago. He wrote movingly about those experiences in his lovely memoir, Dreams from My Father.

Someone with a sense of shame would, in Romney’s shoes, avoid calling Obama an elitist. But Romney is utterly shameless in his pandering. And, as I’ve written, that is his greatest asset. Romney will say absolutely anything if it is the right thing to say politically.

Biographical jiu-jitsu as ridiculous as Romney’s has worked before. Consider George W. Bush. The son of a president and grandson of a senator, he ran portrayed himself as a Washington outsider and his opponent, Al Gore, as an alien creature of the Beltway. In 2004 Bush, a draft-dodger, attacked decorated Vietnam veteran John Kerry as anti-military elitist. And it worked. So laugh at Romney’s silliness if you want to, but the last laugh may be his.

 

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x