Why Tax When You Can Freeze?

Why Tax When You Can Freeze?

"The hard truth" is that controlling the deficit’s going to "require some broad sacrifice" that public workers are going to have to share in, said the Pres.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Corporate profits are up, especially in finance, and yet hiring and wages aren’t. No matter how much productivity spikes, wages stay stagnant. They haven’t budged. That means workers doing more work for less pay. So what’s a Democratic administration to do?

Freeze federal workers’ wages! That’s what. President Obama on Monday announced a two year pay freeze for civilian federal workers. "The hard truth" is that controlling the deficit’s going to "require some broad sacrifice" that public workers are going to have to share in, said the Pres.

A brave move to take on those overpriced slackers on the federal dime. . . Right?

Not quite. Federal workers are an easy target because it’s been drilled into us that public workers are soaking up taxpayer largesse. But it’s not true. As Lawrence Mishel at the Economic Policy Institute notes, federal workers’ pay actually lags behind the private sector about 22 percent—according to the government’s own figures.

And although that $2 billion Obama estimates he’ll save in cost-of-living increases for federal employees sounds like a lot of money, it isn’t. I mean, compare it to the $700 billion that we handed over to Wall Street, or the $700 billion we pour into the war budget…

But where else is the government going to get $2 billion? Well, journalist and Das Krapital blogger Moe Tkacik points out that if we wanted to raise taxes on the wealthiest one percent instead, we’d have to raise them a whole lot! Like, 0.072 percentage points! (“Tax only billionaires and centimillionaires, and you could do it with an extra 0.275 percent in taxes at most," she notes.)

But why tax bailed-out billionaires when there are struggling federal workers you can squeeze?

And a public employees union you can stick it to?

I mean, who ELSE are they going to vote for?

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv and editor of At The Tea Party, out now from OR Books. GRITtv broadcasts weekdays on DISH Network and DIRECTv, on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter and be our friend on

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

We need your support

What’s at stake this November is the future of our democracy. Yet Nation readers know the fight for justice, equity, and peace doesn’t stop in November. Change doesn’t happen overnight. We need sustained, fearless journalism to advocate for bold ideas, expose corruption, defend our democracy, secure our bodily rights, promote peace, and protect the environment.

This month, we’re calling on you to give a monthly donation to support The Nation’s independent journalism. If you’ve read this far, I know you value our journalism that speaks truth to power in a way corporate-owned media never can. The most effective way to support The Nation is by becoming a monthly donor; this will provide us with a reliable funding base.

In the coming months, our writers will be working to bring you what you need to know—from John Nichols on the election, Elie Mystal on justice and injustice, Chris Lehmann’s reporting from inside the beltway, Joan Walsh with insightful political analysis, Jeet Heer’s crackling wit, and Amy Littlefield on the front lines of the fight for abortion access. For as little as $10 a month, you can empower our dedicated writers, editors, and fact checkers to report deeply on the most critical issues of our day.

Set up a monthly recurring donation today and join the committed community of readers who make our journalism possible for the long haul. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth and justice—can you help us thrive for 160 more?

Onwards,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x