Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Was for Recalls Before He Was Against Them

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Was for Recalls Before He Was Against Them

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Was for Recalls Before He Was Against Them

An old campaign tape reveals that Scott Walker, who is spending millions to avert a recall election, once hailed them as democracy in action.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker campaign is spending a lot of the money that Walker and his aides have collected from out-of-state billionaires to fund a television ad campaign preaching against recall elections.

The anti-labor governor’s “Recall: No” campaign—which has been augmented by a push from “Americans for Prosperity,” a project of the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch—argues that the push for a recall election is simply “sour grapes.” Walker and Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch won the 2010 election, the line goes, so the people of Wisconsin should swallow hard and shut up for four years.

This fantasy, that elections produce a “king for four years” or an “elected despot” (to borrow phrases from Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, founders who warned against such calculations), has been promoted by the governor in interviews with right-wing talk radio and his regular appearances on Fox News and CNBC programs.

“A minority of voters will get to force a new election in Wisconsin…costing millions of dollars to the taxpayers this spring,” Walker griped in the latest of the appearances on conservative and business-oriented television programs that he is doing as part of a fund-raising push aimed at attracting donations from Wall Street interests and New York–based speculators.

Career politicians will, of course, say anything to protect themselves from accountability.

But Walker’s anti-recall talk strikes a particularly hypocritical note.

Back when he was a state legislator, Walker was an enthusiastic proponent of recall elections. In fact, he was one of only a handful of state legislators who aligned himself with—and ultimately took money from—a group that was seeking to recall US Senators Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl.

Walker got even more enthusiastic about recalls in 2002, when he became the favored candidate of the group seeking to remove Milwaukee County Executive Tom Ament. After Ament resigned, Walker was elected to replace him.

When he ran for governor in 2012, Walker talked up the recall drive of 2002 as an exercise in democracy—celebrating the recall as a tool for holding errant officials to account.

Speaking of the Milwaukee County fight that made him a statewide figure, Walker said: “You know the folks that were angry about this started a recall and they were told they needed to collect 73,000 signatures in sixty days. Well, not hundreds, not thousands, but tens of thousands of ordinary people did an extraordinary thing. They stood up and took their government back. In less than thirty days they collected more than 150,000 signatures. It was at that moment I realized the real emotion on display in my county wasn’t just about anger. You see, if it had been about anger, it would have been about people checking out and moving out or giving up. But instead what happened was really amazing. You saw people standing up shoulder to shoulder, neighbor to neighbor and saying we want our government back. And in doing so the real emotion on display was about hope.”

Well, not hundreds, not thousands, but tens of thousands of ordinary people are again doing an extraordinary thing. They have gathered more than 300,000 signatures seeking the recall of Scott Walker and Rebecca Kleefisch. People are standing up shoulder to shoulder, neighbor to neighbor and saying we want our government back.

And, yes, the real emotion on display across Wisconsin as the recall drive goes from strength to strength is hope.

Readers can find a link to the video from the 2010 Walker campaign here.

Readers can find a link here to video from the 2011 Recall Walker movement here.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x