Puzzle No. 3223 Puzzle No. 3223
ACROSS 1 “I should buy a hybrid, I should buy a hybrid,” for example? (14) 8 Edgy present, perhaps (5) 9 Follower of head mystic, torn (8) 11 Neutralize Roman poet clutching slip with ease, initially (8) 12 Old city held by very bright, specialized cell (6) 14 Hearing Belafonte is difficult (5) 15 “Manifestations of Chicken”: sign in Pennsylvania (9) 17 Slippery one could ultimately come in to play a guitar or percussion instrument (5,4) 19 “Speedy Snoop Dogg” for Calvin Broadus, e.g. (5) 20 Grandfather, among others, discussed cat’s features (6) 22 Gymnastics feat “Southern Cross” is choreographed (8) 24 Raccoon’s twist-and-squeeze anecdote told (8) 25 Outlandish ideas expressed to the audience (5) 26 Canceled date? It’s a letdown (14) DOWN 1 Science attacks, following baseball team’s award (12) 2 Citrus incense packed in a can with a bit of emulsifier (9) 3 Completely trust our group in fast-food restaurant, starting with dessert (5,2) 4 Gang leader fled junkie—a spectacle (5,5) 5 A nymph in the chorus (4) 6 16 trooped all over (7) 7 Landlord enters—grow nervous (5) 10 Peruvian ancestry? Brilliant (12) 13 Noodles around, playing R.E.M. (six strings) (10) 16 Volatile former pâtissier originally chopped olives (9) 18 Here’s the dish: Martin finally invested in L.A. Story (7) 19 Take it from the top with what’s left: illustrations (7) 21 Fighter, swinging both ways, is out (5) 23 Whitman’s barbaric cry, raised very softly (4) ACROSS 1 29 8 26 down 8 29 1 pun 3 “wins or not” 9 anag. 10 TAB + OO 11 [s]IC[k] + EMAN (name rev.) 12 SLAP + DASH (pals rev.) 14 NORT + HS + TAR (Tron rev.) 17 palindrome 19 hidden 20 anag. 22 GAME(P)LAN 23 PAR + SEE 26 hidden 27 2 defs. 28 2 defs. DOWN 1 anag. 2 [w]ADDLE 3 WARP + ATH[o]S 4 odd letters 5 SME[g] + LLA + RAT (rev.) 6 RET(Y)PE (Peter anag.) 7 2 defs. 13 2 defs. 14 ROLE + MODEL 16 anag. 18 VITA + MIND 21 “a plum” 24 S + TIFF 25 rev.
Jan 10, 2012 / Joshua Kosman and Henri Picciotto
Letters Letters
As Alexandria Burns… New York City In “Upheaval at the New York Public Library—Shhhh!” [Dec. 19], Scott Sherman touches on many of the covert and not so covert changes happening at NYPL. These changes have proved most troubling, both to dedicated staff and to their admiring and grateful public. The NYPL Library for the Performing Arts has experienced the same sort of mergers, dismantling of staff, and cutbacks in budget and research services as did the Forty-second Street library. The research reference desks on the third floor were closed a few years ago. Many of the reference librarians (specialists in dance, music, recorded sound or theater) were eliminated, moved off the reference desks or offered buyouts to leave NYPL. The remaining few research librarians were moved to the second-floor circulation desks and merged with the staff there. Scholars, performing artists, writers and critics who used to come to the third-floor specialists now have to stand in line at the crowded second-floor circulation desks, where people are borrowing scores, CDs or books. When they finally reach the reference desk, they often encounter someone who does not have a specialized background or in-depth knowledge of the research collections. So they leave in frustration. It appears that NYPL’s main goal is to increase the number of people coming in the doors to borrow materials, operate their computers and other devices, attend free classes and meet friends. This is fine, as the library should be a welcoming place and refuge for all. But why cut staff, services and quiet reading rooms for the specialized researchers? In the past NYPL was regarded as one of the greatest public library systems in the world, because it opened to a vast public not only great circulating collections but also world-renowned research collections. Many well-known writers, professors and scientists who couldn’t afford to go to college educated themselves by exploring the enormous richness and diversity of these collections. Consultants hired by NYPL noted that the stats for people coming into the circulating branch libraries were higher than those for the research centers. Librarians tried to explain that there is a qualitative difference between services offered to specialized researchers and to the general public. Researchers need to spend more time with the librarians, explaining their projects and having the librarians plumb the depths of the research collections to find rare, unusual materials to enhance their projects. So it seems that the goal of NYPL is to no longer be known, internationally or domestically, as a major research library but as a New York community library. As the staff, collections and reading rooms of the research collections continue to be downsized, people desiring more specialized research services will have to seek them elsewhere, such as at universities. Researchers accustomed to the superb reference services at NYPL now receive, in some cases, perfunctory assistance, and are forced to find other resources for their research. I agree with Sherman that NYPL should not be secretly making such massive changes without some dialogue with the communities it serves. NAME WITHHELD Ypsilanti, Mich. Scott Sherman raises some good questions about the “closely guarded” NYPL Central Library Plan, and, unusually, he seems to have actually talked with NYPL librarians. As the author of a biography of a distinguished woman librarian who, after a public dispute with NYPL management, was summarily fired in 1918, denied a hearing and secretly reported to the government as a subversive, I was saddened but not surprised that today’s librarians demanded anonymity for fear of retribution. The more things change… How absurd that a plan to completely change the interior and apparently the purpose of a major public building should be kept secret and the librarians not allowed to discuss it. It may be that the superrich VIPs on the board will always go for fantasies of having a big-name architect design a flashy “state-of-the-art, computer-oriented library,” but what does that really mean? Is it just another version of the microform mania once pushed as state-of-the-art, high-tech, etc.? What needs will it meet? Who will use it? Is such an elaborate remodeling really the best use of hundreds of millions of dollars? NYPL has a uniquely complex history and structure, with the central building developed from the privately funded Astor and Lenox libraries. At a time when academic research libraries were just beginning to develop, it was intended to be a sophisticated information resource for an intellectual elite. Not a social or financial elite, an intellectual elite of those doing serious, in-depth reading and research. The branch libraries were to serve the educational and recreational reading needs of the general public. John Shaw Billings’s plan for the building made the stacks central to the library’s mission, with the many reading rooms surrounding the core. That concept soon proved to be expensive and complicated to operate, and within a few years of Billings’s death in 1913 the administration had begun consolidating and closing the specialized divisions. If Anthony Marx complains that “exquisite rooms” are used for storage, he probably refers to the closed reading rooms, but what use will the plan make of them? Blather about replacing “books with people” as “the future of where libraries are going” does not clarify the mysterious plan and sounds potentially anti-intellectual. Assurances of prompt delivery from offsite ignore the fact that the research library has quite limited hours, which will add to the delays. The Central Library Plan needs rigorous public examination. Thanks to Scott Sherman and The Nation for calling attention to it. CLARE BECK
Jan 10, 2012 / Our Readers
States Attempt to Instill ‘Work Ethic’ by Rolling Back Child Labor Protections States Attempt to Instill ‘Work Ethic’ by Rolling Back Child Labor Protections
It's not just Newt Gingrich’s crazy idea. Right-wing legislators are busy chipping away at restrictions on youth employment.
Jan 10, 2012 / Michelle Chen
John Nichols: New Hampshire Voters Are Scared of the GOP Candidates John Nichols: New Hampshire Voters Are Scared of the GOP Candidates
John Nichols, on the ground in New Hampshire, reports that the Republican presidential candidates are scaring even their fellow Republicans.
Jan 10, 2012 / Press Room
Do Ron Paul Supporters Really Think a Racist Ad Helps Their Candidate? Do Ron Paul Supporters Really Think a Racist Ad Helps Their Candidate?
With supporters like these, who needs critics?
Jan 10, 2012 / Katie Halper
Do Gingrich and Santorum Have the Same Speechwriter? Do Gingrich and Santorum Have the Same Speechwriter?
Gingrich and Santorum make the same implausible argument on the campaign trail.
Jan 10, 2012 / Ben Adler
China Warns Obama on US Military Focus on Asia China Warns Obama on US Military Focus on Asia
The White House should seek cooperation, not confrontation, with Beijing.
Jan 10, 2012 / Bob Dreyfuss
Mitt Romney: Extremist in Pinstripes Mitt Romney: Extremist in Pinstripes
Who says Romney isn’t conservative enough?
Jan 10, 2012 / Katrina vanden Heuvel
Occupy Congress on #J17 Occupy Congress on #J17
In its first direct engagement with the federal government, the Occupy movement will take its collective national might to Washington, DC, on January 17.
Jan 10, 2012 / Peter Rothberg
Seven Days of GOP Bigotry Seven Days of GOP Bigotry
How do the GOP presidential candidates manage to pack so much racism into one week?
Jan 10, 2012 / Katie Halper