Biden’s “Big Boy Press Conference” Went Fine, but It Won’t Quiet Doubters
The president started with a flub but ended strong. It may not matter.
President Joe Biden speaks at a news conference during the NATO Summit in Washington, DC, on July 11, 2024.
(Graeme Sloan / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The press conference started badly and nearly two hours after it was initially scheduled. Earlier in the day, he’d called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “President Putin,” and tried to turn it into a joke. “No, we’re going to beat Putin!”
At first, Biden mangled words, coughed, spoke softly, and, when asked about whether Vice President Kamala Harris was qualified to be president, insisted, “I wouldn’t have picked Vice President Trump to be vice president if she wasn’t qualified.” (He did affirm Harris’s qualifications to be president, but said he was more qualified. Understandably.)
But Biden eased into the format and got stronger the more he talked policy. His advocacy of his economic policies, especially his defense of unions and rebuilding manufacturing, was strong. “I was determined to stop trickle-down economic theory,” he said.
Biden was at his best talking about the recently closed NATO summit and his foreign policy. His success in assembling the coalition behind Ukraine President Zelensky is genuine. One of his best arguments was that he’d added Finland and Sweden to NATO, and prevented “the Finlandization of Ukraine versus NATO-ization of Ukraine.” You can disagree with his Ukraine policy, but he executed it well and defended it strongly. His voice got stronger as he went on. He spoke more slowly, but also more authoritatively. He boasted of his relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Biden also returned to praise Harris and got her name right this time, but showed his discomfort with abortion politics. He demanded “the freedom of women’s bodies to have control over their bodies.” Later he shouted, “Control guns, not girls!” And while I definitely agree with that, it was a little weird. He’s not on solid ground on these issues, while his vice president is one of the best advocates we have.
He periodically got feisty, in a good way, asking the reporters: “Do you think democracy is under siege, based on this [Supreme Court]…Project 2025? We’ve never been here before. And that’s why I didn’t hand off to another generation. We’ve got to finish this job.”
And he got off a funny line: “I mean, my schedule has been full. Where has Trump been? Riding around in his golf cart, filling out his scorecard before he hits the ball. Look, he’s done virtually nothing.”
It’s not clear that Biden’s decent performance will stop Democratic leaders’ calls for him to drop his campaign. Democratic Representative Jim Himes made a statement calling on him to step aside the minute the press conference ended.
More on Joe Biden
I have questions about the wisdom of his staff setting up events like this press conference in the first place. Remember, it was the Biden campaign that demanded the June debate with Trump, believing it would remind voters of his acuity and Trump’s derangement. That backfired. As did the scheduling of the interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos last week. These events summon millions of keyboard warriors (like myself) to examine his every throat-clearing and verbal flub.
On Thursday came disturbing news that alleged campaign “officials” or “insiders” are telling reporters anonymously, first at NBC News and The New York Times, that they believe Biden has no path to victory. “He needs to drop out,” one Biden campaign official told NBC News. “He will never recover from this.” Unnamed advisers told the Times they were trying to figure out how to convince him to leave the race. What is going on? Earlier this week, the campaign dubbed his Thursday night NATO confab his “big boy press conference.” Are they trying to infantilize him? Would that maybe offset concerns about his age and his various senior moments?
Biden had a comparatively good night. But he hasn’t stopped the political bleeding.
Can we count on you?
In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.
We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.
Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.
Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.
Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation
