Should Andrew Cuomo Go To Jail for “Forcible Touching”?

Should Andrew Cuomo Go To Jail for “Forcible Touching”?

Should Andrew Cuomo Go To Jail for “Forcible Touching”?

Why not ask the 21 men—mostly Black or brown—currently locked up for the same crime?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Waaaah!” go the white men.

Yesterday, the Albany County sheriff charged Andrew Cuomo with a misdemeanor for grabbing a woman’s breast—and the grievance politics are already flying. In addition to the randos on Twitter rallying to the disgraced ex-governor’s defense, there’s his spokesman, Rich Azzopardi, eagerly ginning them up about who the real victim is: “The abuse of power and misconduct demonstrated by this Cowboy Sheriff and AG James has to stop,” he said in a statement Friday.

Speaking of victims, remember Brittany Commisso? She’s the $65,000-a-year state employee who described Cuomo summoning her to “work” at the Governor’s Mansion, where he assaulted her. The new criminal charges come on the heels of the attorney general’s independent investigation and 168-page report verifying Commisso’s account of Cuomo’s truly gross misconduct, including some pathetic and frankly eighth-grade attempts to feel her up under the pretense of too tight hugs and forced selfies. Unfortunately, it’s that picture the New York Post and others are now plastering all over the Internet without context, making it seem like Commisso was happy to be locked into her boss’s death grip, so she probably didn’t mind when he slid his hand down her shirt. What people need to see instead is a young woman at work smiling her way through an illegal and disgusting prelude by the governor of New York to violate her “for the purposes of degrading and gratifying his sexual desires,” to quote the complaint.

Forcible touching is an Article 130 crime in the penal code punishable by up to one year in prison. And much like the aggrieved white men of the FDNY and NYPD protesting New York City’s vaccine mandate for public employees, the guy who signs the laws thinks he’s above them.

He’s not alone. Piping up on Morning Joe, the eponymous host groused about how Cuomo is being targeted and these charges would never be brought against “Andrew Smith.” Wow, OK. For one, if Joe Scarborough’s imaginary friend is a white guy, then, yeah, he probably wouldn’t be charged given that “they let you do it, you can do anything,” as a man who knows about forcible touching once said. But if Smith is Black or brown, like most of the 21 people currently locked up at Rikers Island for the same crime, then they sure as shit do. And why should there be any exception for the previously most powerful man in the state—whom Westchester County Executive George Latimer once shamelessly compared to Emmet Till? (Latimer subsequently apologized.) “He’s being railroaded!” they whine, like Scarborough, who erroneously claimed on national television, “If someone said something to a friend, that’s the new standard!”

This is all more of the same complete and utter bullshit from Cuomo and his stans. Dubbing themselves “We Decide Inc”—which seems fitting for a fan club devoted to a guy who doesn’t understand consent—they’ve opened an online shop selling sweatshirts emblazoned with meaningless Cuomoisms like, “As complicated as life gets, it’s as simple as Life is.”

Fine. In which case I’ll take one “Allegedly” T-shirt, please.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x